1998
DOI: 10.1118/1.598458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropy functions for and sources

Abstract: The anisotropy function was defined by AAPM Task Group 43 in a recent report, and reference data were provided. However, some of the data appeared to have large experimental errors. In this work, anisotropy functions are presented for three low‐energy photon‐emitting sources commonly used for brachytherapy: 125normalI source models 6702 and 6711, and the model 200 103Pd source. The data were generated via a two‐step process: the sources' intrinsic radiation emission pattern was determined from in‐air measureme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
52
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Anisotropy factors as a function of radius for several commercially available sources are listed in Table VII. Results from the present work compare favorably with those of previous studies evaluating similar or identical sources, 39 , 40 , 42 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anisotropy factors as a function of radius for several commercially available sources are listed in Table VII. Results from the present work compare favorably with those of previous studies evaluating similar or identical sources, 39 , 40 , 42 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Additionally, values are consistent with reports on two other commercially available sources (Table VIII). 39 , 40 , 42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 shows the variation of the anisotropy function with radial distance in water. The F ( r , θ) of the ADVANTAGE source in water was compared with those of the Model 200 source determined by Weaver, (16) previous work on the ADVANTAGE source determined by Meigooni et al, (12) the NAS MED3633 determined by Li and Palta, (15) and the Best Pd103 determined by Meigooni et al (14) (Figs. 4 and 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 8 shows the comparison of the F ðr; yÞ of the InterSource 125 source with Model 6711 (Weaver, 1998), Model 6702 (Weaver, 1998), IoGold (Wallace and Fan, 1999), and Best (R) 125 I (Meigooni et al, 2000) at a distance of 5 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%