2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2007.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic thermal expansion and hydrogen bonding behavior of portlandite: A high-temperature neutron diffraction study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The a and c unit-cell parameter values for the unirradiated compounds are the ones expected at room temperature [2,3]. We have also noted in Table 6 the values of lattice parameters of deuterated brucite and portlandite powders measured by neutron diffraction at various temperatures, between 35°C (40°C) and 250°C [11,12]. For both compounds, both a and c parameters increase with increasing temperature, and c faster than a by a factor of ~5 in Mg(OD)2 and of ~ 4.5 in Ca(OD)2.…”
Section: Electronradiation Effect On Structural Parameters: Changes In the Interplanar Distances And Lattice Parameters In Damaged Portlasupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The a and c unit-cell parameter values for the unirradiated compounds are the ones expected at room temperature [2,3]. We have also noted in Table 6 the values of lattice parameters of deuterated brucite and portlandite powders measured by neutron diffraction at various temperatures, between 35°C (40°C) and 250°C [11,12]. For both compounds, both a and c parameters increase with increasing temperature, and c faster than a by a factor of ~5 in Mg(OD)2 and of ~ 4.5 in Ca(OD)2.…”
Section: Electronradiation Effect On Structural Parameters: Changes In the Interplanar Distances And Lattice Parameters In Damaged Portlasupporting
confidence: 60%
“…the difference between Fe-O distances measured by EXAFS and those derived from the crystal structure refinement of Chichagov et al (1990) (Table 2) might be due to differences in the fractional z positions of the oxygen atom, as is known to occur for other isostructural minerals [e.g., z = 0.23 in portlandite, Ca(OH) 2 (Xu et al, 2007), whereas z = 0.22 in brucite, Mg(OH) 2 (Zigan and Rothbauer, 1967)]. The z = 1/4 position proposed by Chichagov et al (1990) thus appears to be an approximation.…”
Section: Fe K-edge Exafs Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] using time-of-flight neutron diffraction, is greater than the calibrated thermal expansion of C-S-H solid reduction of the Portlandite fraction results in a decrease of the homogenized thermal expansion coefficients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%