Abstract:Advancing (theta(A)) and receding (theta(R)) contact angles were measured with several probe liquids on the external facets (201), (001), (011), and (110) of macroscopic form I paracetamol crystals as well as the cleaved (internal) facet (010). For the external crystal facets, dispersive surface energies gamma(d) calculated from the contact angles were found to be similar (34 +/- 1 mJ/m(2)), while the polar components varied significantly. Cleaving the crystals exposed a more apolar (010) surface with very dif… Show more
“…In complex crystalline materials it is very likely that chemical groups on each crystal facet are dissimilar and thus have very different surface properties. It has been recently reported that the individual crystal facets of paracetamol form I exhibit anisotropic contact angle wettability and some significant variations in both dispersive and polar surface energy for facets (201), (001), (011) and (110) (26). These results were ascribed to variations in the surface hydroxyl group concentrations which were verified with XPS.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…These d SV values are however very similar of those obtained by liquid sessile drop contact angle measurements on the external facets of a macroscopic single crystal. d SV of the external facets of paracetamol crystal as measured by contact angles was 34.4 mJ/m 2 (26).…”
Section: Dispersive Energy Of Unmilled Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Differences have been observed for the liquid sessile drop contact angles on the different crystal facets of paracetamol. The detailed anisotropic wetting behaviour for these single crystals is reported elsewhere (26).…”
“…In complex crystalline materials it is very likely that chemical groups on each crystal facet are dissimilar and thus have very different surface properties. It has been recently reported that the individual crystal facets of paracetamol form I exhibit anisotropic contact angle wettability and some significant variations in both dispersive and polar surface energy for facets (201), (001), (011) and (110) (26). These results were ascribed to variations in the surface hydroxyl group concentrations which were verified with XPS.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…These d SV values are however very similar of those obtained by liquid sessile drop contact angle measurements on the external facets of a macroscopic single crystal. d SV of the external facets of paracetamol crystal as measured by contact angles was 34.4 mJ/m 2 (26).…”
Section: Dispersive Energy Of Unmilled Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Differences have been observed for the liquid sessile drop contact angles on the different crystal facets of paracetamol. The detailed anisotropic wetting behaviour for these single crystals is reported elsewhere (26).…”
“…Heng et al (Heng et al, 2006) confirmed that the effect of surface roughness on contact angle hysteresis for single crystalline paracetamol was negligible. For rubbed JASL-9800 films displayed here, the surface roughness is less than 1 nm.…”
Section: Anisotropic Wettability Of Rubbed Polyimide Filmsmentioning
“…Using macroscopic crystals, Heng et al (10) were able to measure experimentally the anisotropic surface energetics and wettability of APIs. The facet-specific surface energetics were found to be mainly due to chemical heterogeneities present on the surfaces, with negligible influence on the data due to surface roughness, dissolution, swelling and non-equilibrium effects (11). The approach greatly enhances the quality and quantity of surface energetic and chemical information one can obtain from crystalline pharmaceuticals using a liquid probe technique such as contact angle.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.