2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic elastic moduli and internal friction of graphene nanoplatelets/silicon nitride composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the Young modulus is the highest in the transversely isotropic plane (E 1 = 38.66 GPa) and the smallest in direction perpendicular to this plane (E 3 = 1.55 GPa). However, the Young moduli both in the in-plane and out-of-plane directions are incomparably smaller than those of graphite (E 1 = 1.03 TPa and E 3 = 36.1 GPa [18]), probably because of the porosity and the micromechanics of the GNPs in the studied material similar to the one suggested for GNPs embedded in a ceramic matrix in [10]. Nieto et al [11] reported on the Young moduli of the bulk GNPs measured by nanoindentation with signicantly dierent results (E 3 = 8.7 GPa and E 1 exhibiting a bi-modal distribution with the values E 1 = 10.3 GPa and E 1 = 15.2 GPa).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that the Young modulus is the highest in the transversely isotropic plane (E 1 = 38.66 GPa) and the smallest in direction perpendicular to this plane (E 3 = 1.55 GPa). However, the Young moduli both in the in-plane and out-of-plane directions are incomparably smaller than those of graphite (E 1 = 1.03 TPa and E 3 = 36.1 GPa [18]), probably because of the porosity and the micromechanics of the GNPs in the studied material similar to the one suggested for GNPs embedded in a ceramic matrix in [10]. Nieto et al [11] reported on the Young moduli of the bulk GNPs measured by nanoindentation with signicantly dierent results (E 3 = 8.7 GPa and E 1 exhibiting a bi-modal distribution with the values E 1 = 10.3 GPa and E 1 = 15.2 GPa).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, for the silicon nitride/GNP composite reported in [10], the Hill averaging method (using E =324 GPa for pure silicon nitride and the above obtained results E 1 = 38.66 GPa and E 3 = 1.55 GPa for GNPs) gives E 1 = 273 GPa and E 3 = 168 GPa. However, the experimental results E 1 = 308 GPa and E 3 = 240 GPa for this CMC [10] are signicantly higher.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The functional properties include a high Young's modulus (0.5 -1 TPa) [10] and a high tensile strength (130 GPa) [11] which is why it is being considered for reinforcement in polymer, metallic, and ceramic composite matrices [12][13][14]. Graphene Nanoplatelets (GNP) are made up of multiple layers of graphene held together by weak van der Waals forces.…”
Section: Graphene Nanoplatelet Reinforcement In Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%