1977
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210410149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic broadening of linewidth in the EPR spectrum of Feo in silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This broadening depends on the angle between magnetic field and crystal axes even for defects of otherwise cubic symmetry ͑see for example interstitial iron in silicon͒. 26,27 In the present problem there is a strong fine structure interaction caused by the monoclinic arrangement of the defects. The corresponding definite values of the fine structure parameters D 0 and E 0 are varied by contributions due to the randomly distributed strains.…”
Section: A Angular Dependencies Of Effective G Values and Linewidthsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This broadening depends on the angle between magnetic field and crystal axes even for defects of otherwise cubic symmetry ͑see for example interstitial iron in silicon͒. 26,27 In the present problem there is a strong fine structure interaction caused by the monoclinic arrangement of the defects. The corresponding definite values of the fine structure parameters D 0 and E 0 are varied by contributions due to the randomly distributed strains.…”
Section: A Angular Dependencies Of Effective G Values and Linewidthsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For these strains one might assume distribution functions as usual. [25][26][27] This assumption results in a Gaussian distribution for the value of ϵE/D about the value of 0…”
Section: A Angular Dependencies Of Effective G Values and Linewidthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a controversial discussion as to the origin of the large reduction of the orbital angular momentum factor g l of the g factor of the ground state gϭ 5 3 g s Ϫ 2 3 g l measured in EPR. This reduction has been interpreted in the literature assuming that Si:Fe i ϩ is a Jahn-Teller ͑JT͒ system showing a Ham effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After heating and quenching all samples showed a nearly isotropic FeO EPR signal with a peak-to-peak linewidth AB,, < 0.2 mT. Assuming an intrinsic linewidth of 0.1 mT and Gaussian distributions with the halfwidthsa and j3 of the remaining normal and tangential stresses, respectively, the parameters 01 and j3 were determined from the weak angular dependent EPR line broadening [9]. For samples carefully prepared as described above the values are n = (1.9 f 0.2) x 105 Pa and B = (1.2 f 0.2) x lo6 Pa, and without special care during preparation they were found in the ranges (0.5 to 1) x lo6 Pa and (2.5 to 3) x lo6 Pa, respectively.…”
Section: Preparation Of Starting Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%