Animated human agents with motion planning capability for 3D‐space postural goals

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method for an animated human agent to construct motion plans to achieve 3D-space postural goals, e.g. a goal of a hand, while avoiding collisions. we us the potential field approach by providing mechanisms to handle the problem of local minimum. Given a conjunctive goal of multiple control points on the body, the potential field approach tries to minimize the objective function typically defined to be a weighted sum of individual goals. The local minimum problem arises as the planner tries to locally minimize the weighted sum of individual goals, even when multiple goals of the control points do not conflict with each other in 3D space. Our approach handles this problem by trying to achieve multiple goals individually, not by means of a weighted sum. To do so, the planner uses a qualitative kinematic model, which specifies what joint motions move what body parts in which directions in 3D space. The model is used to suggest joint motions for individual goals, and to explicitly detect and remove conflicts between the suggested joint motions. The local minimum problem arises more obviously when the original goals and collisionavoidance constraints, i.e.repulsive potential fields due to obstacles conflict with each other in 3D space. Our approach avoids this conflict by finding intermediate postural goals of the endangered body parts, based on the kinematic simulation of the current plan. AbstractIn this paper, we present a method for an animated human agent to construct motion plans to achieve 3D-space postural goals, e.g. a goal of a hand, while avoiding collisions. We use the potential eld approach by providing mechanisms to handle the problem of local minimum. Given a conjunctive goal of multiple control points on the body, the potential eld approach tries to minimize the objective function typically dened to be a weighted sum of individual goals. The local minimum problem arises as the planner tries to locally minimize the weighted sum of individual goals, even when multiple goals of the control points do not conict with each other in 3D space. Our approach handles this problem by trying to achieve multiple goals individually, not by means of a weighted sum. To do so, the planner uses a qualitative kinematic model, which species what joint motions move what body parts in which directions in 3D space. The model is used to suggest joint motions for individual goals, and to explicitly detect and remove conicts between the suggested joint motions. The local minimum problem arises more obviously when the original goals and collision-avoidance constraints, i.e. repulsive potential elds due to obstacles conict with each other in 3D space. Our approach avoids this conict by nding intermediate postural goals of the endangered body parts, based on the kinematic simulation of the current plan. IntroductionAs well documented in [1], the animation of human motion has a wide variety of applications, e.g. entertainment, ergonomic studies, computer-aided design of human workspaces, and gene...

Including Human Behavior in Product Simulations for the Investigation of Use Processes in Conceptual Design: A Survey

“…The included cognitive behavior covers short-time memory of perceived objects, and searching the surroundings for objects. Jung et al [63] present an agentbased simulation technique for human motion planning through spaces populated with objects. It covers cognitive behavior, control behavior, actuator behavior and kinematics.…”

Motion generation of virtual human with hierarchical reinforcement learning

“…In the method of motion planning using a knowledge base [4,5], motion is automatically generated by continuously combining simple motions, but the naturalness of overall motion is not considered to any great extent. Similarly, in the method of walking motion planning for a virtual human by using a multilayer lattice [6], the motion used to arrive at the goal position can be generated efficiently while avoiding obstacles, but only combinations of the given motions can be realized.…”

Motion patches

“…Animation and control of human figures in synthetic environments have been studied in computer graphics for the last decade [Bandi and Thalmann 1997;Bindiganavale et al 1994;Jung et al 1994;Noser et al 1995;Thorne et al 2004]. This problem is very difficult because human motion is high-dimensional, and many degrees of freedom need to be choreographed in a coordinated, collision-free, human-like manner.…”