2009
DOI: 10.2741/3554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal models of smoke inhalation induced injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 85 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a follow-up investigation, the chest computed tomography (CT) examination of firefighters with high-intensity World Trade Center (WTC) exposure showed that they were with bronchial wall thickening, emphysema and respiratory symptoms (Liu et al, 2019b). Studies have demonstrated that the stimulation of the respiratory system by a range of harmful chemicals such as carbon monoxide, cyanide and malondialdehyde, can lead to dyspnea and even suffocation, which is linked to oxidative stress/ antioxidant stress imbalance and inflammatory cascades (David et al, 2009). In this paper, it was found that rhKGF-2 exerts its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, thus reducing SILI through both in-vitro and in-vivo experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…According to a follow-up investigation, the chest computed tomography (CT) examination of firefighters with high-intensity World Trade Center (WTC) exposure showed that they were with bronchial wall thickening, emphysema and respiratory symptoms (Liu et al, 2019b). Studies have demonstrated that the stimulation of the respiratory system by a range of harmful chemicals such as carbon monoxide, cyanide and malondialdehyde, can lead to dyspnea and even suffocation, which is linked to oxidative stress/ antioxidant stress imbalance and inflammatory cascades (David et al, 2009). In this paper, it was found that rhKGF-2 exerts its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, thus reducing SILI through both in-vitro and in-vivo experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%