Peritoneal Surgery 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1194-5_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Adhesion Models: Design, Variables, and Relevance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of the specific animal model of peritoneal injury on experimental outcomes and their significance in humans has been well recognized 15. Each animal model has pros and cons, although these are not always very well defined in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the specific animal model of peritoneal injury on experimental outcomes and their significance in humans has been well recognized 15. Each animal model has pros and cons, although these are not always very well defined in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of animal models have been used, small (mice, rat and rabbit) and large (sheep, pig, monkey and horse) (12). Models do stimulate adhesionformation in different ways, including colon and side wall abrasion, crushing, desiccation, incision, excision, electrocautery, laser injury, thermal injury, chemical injury, radiation injury, and foreign body-tissue irritation (12,13). However, the usefulness of those models is hampered by the variability of adhesion formation in the positive control animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized that the double injury rabbit model used in this work is significantly more challenging than models used in other studies to evaluate compounds that show good efficacy in animal studies but relatively poorer performance in the clinic [59]. In this light, the observed ~70% reduction in adhesion area is of potential clinical significance for adhesion prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%