1995
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270195001648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anhydrous DL-Glutamic Acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are well‐documented cases in which the conformations of enantiomers are influenced by crystal packing forces. Structures of enantiopure and racemic amino acids have provided several interesting examples 8. Structures of (+)‐ and (±)‐ketopinic acids revealed a total of eight conformationally distinct contributors to the two structures, and these result from the low barriers to carboxyl rotation in this molecule 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are well‐documented cases in which the conformations of enantiomers are influenced by crystal packing forces. Structures of enantiopure and racemic amino acids have provided several interesting examples 8. Structures of (+)‐ and (±)‐ketopinic acids revealed a total of eight conformationally distinct contributors to the two structures, and these result from the low barriers to carboxyl rotation in this molecule 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anhydrous DL-glutamic acid (Dunitz and Schweizer 1995) is monoclinic, whereas DL-glutamic acid monohydrate (Ciunik and Glowiak 1983;Flaig et al 2002) is orthorhombic. In all glutamic acid crystals, there is only one molecule in the asymmetric unit (assuming gauche conformation, Fig.…”
Section: Glutamic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with scattering length b j and position vector r j was calculated by importing the crystallographic information file (CIF) (Dunitz & Schweizer, 1995) of the phase of LGA from the Crystallography Open Database (COD) (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003;Gražulis et al, 2009Gražulis et al, , 2012 to the Visualization for Electronic and Structural Analysis (VESTA) program (Momma & Izumi, 2011). However, because VESTA does not support the calculation of proton-polarized samples, the hydrogen scattering length was changed manually by adjusting the occupancy at hydrogen sites in the CIF data to calculate FðQ; P H 6 ¼ 0%Þ.…”
Section: Calculation Of Crystal Structure Factormentioning
confidence: 99%