2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular stable lateral plating is a valid alternative to conventional plate fixation in the proximal phalanx. A biomechanical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16] In another biomechanical cadaver study comparing dorsal and lateral plates, it was shown that 1.5-mm non-locking dorsal plate placement did not have a biomechanical advantage over lateral locking plate placement in proximal phalangeal fractures and that 1.3-mm low-profile lateral locking plates provided more rigid fixation. [17] Robinson et al [9] treated twenty-five extra-articular proximal phalangeal fractures with dorsal plating and 17 fractures with lateral plating, and they found no difference in terms of results between both approaches. Omokawa et al [18] achieved better results with lateral plating than with dorsal plating in proximal phalangeal fractures treated with low-profile locking plates in terms of TAM, and suggested the use of lateral plate placement unless there was comminution and intra-articular fragmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] In another biomechanical cadaver study comparing dorsal and lateral plates, it was shown that 1.5-mm non-locking dorsal plate placement did not have a biomechanical advantage over lateral locking plate placement in proximal phalangeal fractures and that 1.3-mm low-profile lateral locking plates provided more rigid fixation. [17] Robinson et al [9] treated twenty-five extra-articular proximal phalangeal fractures with dorsal plating and 17 fractures with lateral plating, and they found no difference in terms of results between both approaches. Omokawa et al [18] achieved better results with lateral plating than with dorsal plating in proximal phalangeal fractures treated with low-profile locking plates in terms of TAM, and suggested the use of lateral plate placement unless there was comminution and intra-articular fragmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinical setting, great success has been achieved by fixating fractures by using this method [ 10 ]. Additionally, Shanmugam et al [ 11 ] reported that lateral and dorsal plating did not exhibit mechanical differences in terms of fixating the proximal phalanx. However, comprehensive mechanical experiments that examine the fixation of the metacarpal shaft by using lateral and dorsal plating are currently lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In phalanges, lateral plating and dorsal plating offer similar mechanical strength (axial stiffness and loading to failure) and postoperative functioning [ 11 , 28 ]. However, a retrospective study by Hustedt et al [ 9 ] indicated that although lateral plating offers slightly better results for removing internal fixation and range of motion, the differences were not statistically significant [ 9 ]; the researchers were unable to identify the reason behind the higher failure rate of lateral side plating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-profile anatomic plates (LPAP) have been designed to require less soft tissue dissection and decrease soft tissue irritation, and have been shown to have similar construct stiffness and strength compared with the more traditional 2.7-mm dynamic compression plate (DCP) plating system in a metacarpal fracture model. 5 A biomechanical study by Shanmugam et al 6 demonstrated that laterally placed low-profile phalanx plates have similar construct stiffness and load to failure as laterally and dorsally placed traditional phalanx plates; however, they did not test dorsally placed LPAP. The LPAP should allow anatomic reduction and stable fixation, allowing early ROM, while decreasing soft tissue dissection and postoperative irritation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%