1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.32.3351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular relation and energy dependence of Andreev reflection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to a small energy loss of the electron due to its condensation into a Cooper pair, the holes energy and in-plane momentum, and hence its angle of reflection, are in all generality smaller than that of the incident electron. This effect is exceedingly small in typical metallic systems where E F strongly exceeds typical energies of , and perfect retro-AR in these systems has been confirmed in great detail [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Due to a small energy loss of the electron due to its condensation into a Cooper pair, the holes energy and in-plane momentum, and hence its angle of reflection, are in all generality smaller than that of the incident electron. This effect is exceedingly small in typical metallic systems where E F strongly exceeds typical energies of , and perfect retro-AR in these systems has been confirmed in great detail [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The current-carrying states in high magnetic fields are edge states at the 2D EG boundary with Fermi energy E F . The edge states with Landau level index n (referred to collectively äs an edge channel) can only be transmitted across a potential barrier if their guiding center energy (6) exceeds the potential-barrier height (disregarding tunneling through the barrier). Here a> c =eB/m is the cyclotron frequency, and the Zeeman spin Splitting is ignored for simplicity.…”
Section: Transition To the Quantum Hall Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focusing action of a magnetic field can then be detected in an elegant way by usmg a second point contact, which acts äs a collector or voltage probe (drawmg no net current). This technique, pioneered by Sharvm 1 and Tsoi, 2 is a powerful tool to obtain Information on the shape of the Fermi surface, 3 on electron-phonon interaction, 4 and on surface scattenng The surface can be a free surface of a crystal, 5 or a metal-superconductor mterface 6 (Andreev reflection 7 ) In metals, electron focusing is essentially a classical transport phenomenon, because of the small Fermi wavelength λ^ (typically 0.5 nm)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very important physical process in this respect is the Andreev reflection, 15 whereby an electron incident on a superconductor-normal interface is ͑partially͒ retroreflected as a hole into the normal conductor and a Cooper pair is created in the superconductor. The first direct experimental observation of the peculiar property of the Andreev reflection, i.e., that all velocity components are reversed, was achieved by Benistant et al 2,3 using the versatile tool of transverse electron focusing ͑TEF͒. 16 The experimental and theoretical investigation of the two-dimensional electron gas using the TEF technique has been pioneered by van Houten et al 17 ͑see also a recent review 18 discussing these experiments in terms of coherent electron optics͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%