2011
DOI: 10.1117/1.3589093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular high-speed massively parallel detection spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for speckle reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SNR is defined as SNR = μ b /σ b , where μ b and σ b are the mean and the standard deviation of the intensity, which is calculated in the background region of the image (for the retinal image it is the vitreous-humor area). 4 The CNR is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SNR is defined as SNR = μ b /σ b , where μ b and σ b are the mean and the standard deviation of the intensity, which is calculated in the background region of the image (for the retinal image it is the vitreous-humor area). 4 The CNR is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the two most widely used approaches involve either hardware-or software-based techniques. The hardware-based techniques rely on the uncorrelated speckle between different angles, positions, or wavelengths, such as the angular 4,5 and frequency 6 compounding techniques. Another recent hardware-based approach to speckle reduction is the technique of strain compounding, 7,8 which compresses the sample to create the uncorrelated speckle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel approaches, the sample is usually illuminated with a single high NA beam, and angle is encoded in a specific domain. Examples include spatial encoding and array detection [44,47,48], path-length encoding [49] and Doppler frequency shift encoding [50]. Most encoding domains degrade the OCT signal: Array approaches are prone to poor sensitivity due to detector noise, cross-talk and/or lower spectral resolution, whereas path length encoding suffers from sensitivity roll-off and decreased imaging range.…”
Section: Theory: Hardware Speckle Reduction Collection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in JA-OCT an OCT signal can only be detected if the passive channels are perfectly aligned. In other parallel approaches, the numerical aperture (NA) is the same for illumination and detection, which is often a direct consequence of the underlying free-space interferometer layout [44,47,48]. Thus, the confocal gate is either not present at all [44,47,48], which leads to signal-degrading cross-talk, or the confocal gate is the same for all angles [49,50], such that the scattering direction is not unambiguously defined.…”
Section: Theory: Hardware Speckle Reduction Collection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods have been used to reduce speckle noise in OCT, such as frame averaging [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] (or space compounding [8]), angular compounding, [9,10] frequency compounding, [11] strain compounding, [12] and single Bscan filtering. [13,14] Among them, frame averaging technique is widely used in clinical OCT systems, such as RTVue (Optovue, CA), Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), Spectral OCT/SLO (OPKO/OTI, Miami, FL), Cirrus (Zeiss Meditec, CA) and 3D OCT-2000 (Topcon, Japan).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%