2015
DOI: 10.1364/oe.23.007755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle-of-arrival reception for optical wireless location technology

Abstract: An optical wireless location (OWL) system is introduced for indoor positioning. The OWL system makes use of a mobile photoreceiver that facilitates triangulation by measuring angle-of-arrival (AOA) bearings from LEDs in an optical beacon grid. The photoreceiver has three photodiodes (PDs), arranged in a corner-cube, to facilitate differential photocurrent sensing of the incident light AOA, by way of azimuthal ϕ and polar θ angles. The AOA error for indoor positioning is characterized empirically. Optical AOA p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximity [9] 1-2 m Low Mobile phone [16] m Medium Exp-Setup, dsPIC Board [12] 4.5 m Medium MSP 430 [17] 0.01-0.48 m Low [18] 0.3-0.6 m Medium [19] 0.4 m Medium Exp-Setup, RF, LED Fingerprinting [20] 5 cm Low Exp-Setup + E4832A [21] 10 cm Medium [22] 10 cm Low [10] 15-20 cm Medium Exp-Setup, Covered [23] 10 cm Medium [24] 85 cm Medium [25] 1-2 cm Medium [26] 20-80 cm Low [27] 1.69 cm Medium [28] 7 cm Low [29] 5 cm Medium Camera, Robot [30] 5 cm High Exp-Setup [31] 1.3 cm High Exp-Setup, mobile robot [32] 10 cm Medium [33] 10 cm Medium TDoA [34] 2-5 cm High [35] 1 cm High [36] 3.9 cm Medium [37] 0.3 cm Medium [38] 2 cm High [6] -cm AoA [11] 1-2 m Medium Exp-Setup, 5331 APD [39] 0.3 m Medium Mobile phone [40] 5-30 cm High [41] 10 cm High Tripod, protractor, PC [42] 8 cm High [43] 5 cm Medium Table 1. Cont.…”
Section: Algorithm Reference Accuracy Complexity Receiver System Exp mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximity [9] 1-2 m Low Mobile phone [16] m Medium Exp-Setup, dsPIC Board [12] 4.5 m Medium MSP 430 [17] 0.01-0.48 m Low [18] 0.3-0.6 m Medium [19] 0.4 m Medium Exp-Setup, RF, LED Fingerprinting [20] 5 cm Low Exp-Setup + E4832A [21] 10 cm Medium [22] 10 cm Low [10] 15-20 cm Medium Exp-Setup, Covered [23] 10 cm Medium [24] 85 cm Medium [25] 1-2 cm Medium [26] 20-80 cm Low [27] 1.69 cm Medium [28] 7 cm Low [29] 5 cm Medium Camera, Robot [30] 5 cm High Exp-Setup [31] 1.3 cm High Exp-Setup, mobile robot [32] 10 cm Medium [33] 10 cm Medium TDoA [34] 2-5 cm High [35] 1 cm High [36] 3.9 cm Medium [37] 0.3 cm Medium [38] 2 cm High [6] -cm AoA [11] 1-2 m Medium Exp-Setup, 5331 APD [39] 0.3 m Medium Mobile phone [40] 5-30 cm High [41] 10 cm High Tripod, protractor, PC [42] 8 cm High [43] 5 cm Medium Table 1. Cont.…”
Section: Algorithm Reference Accuracy Complexity Receiver System Exp mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, Dempster et al apply the DoP measure to characterize the quality of AoA-based positioning systems [33]. Arafa et al investigate an effect of DoP on the localization performance of the optical wireless ILS [34]. In [12], the authors propose an analytical DoP-based uncertainty model of precision and apply it with the fingerprinting method to customize the RTLS aimed in an improvement of its performance in terms of localization precision.…”
Section: Survey Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods present their intricacies. The major drawback of AOA is that the system need expensive sensor arrays or ISs to measure the incident angle with high accuracy, which is needed in indoor environments [24]. TOA need accurate synchronization between Tx (LED) and Rx, which increases the deployment cost [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%