“…Many previous studies have suggested that ACEIs supress the progression of renal failure or reduce proteinuria [2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10]. However, most of them were based on a short-term follow-up of less than 12 months, and only 3 randomized controlled studies have been conducted for 1 year or longer to evaluate the renoprotective effect of ACEIs in comparison with other antihypertensive agents [8, 9, 10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were reported by some authors to have a specific suppressive effect on the progression of renal failure which cannot be explained by their antihypertensive effect [2, 3, 4]. However, the few long-term prospective randomized studies that assessed the renoprotective effect of ACEIs actually provided no substantial evidence supporting the specific renoprotective effect [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no previous studies [2, 3, 4] on the renal effect of ACEIs were performed in patients on a restricted protein intake.…”
The effect of enalapril (5–10 mg/day) on the progression of chronic renal failure (CRF) was compared with that of metoprolol (40–120 mg/day) in 28 patients for 24 months in a prospective study. Throughout the study, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in protein intake and urinary sodium excretion. But there was a significant difference between the 2 groups in diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure at 6 months. In the serum creatinine level, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. In creatinine clearance, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups at 24 months. In addition, the progression of CRF was significantly faster in the metoprolol group than the enalapril group as estimated from the slope of creatinine clearance (p < 0.05) and the slope of glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.0005). In urinary protein excretion, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups at 6 and 18 months (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that enalapril has a suppressive effect on the progression of CRF and also has an antiproteinuric effect by a mechanism independent of its antihypertensive effect.
“…Many previous studies have suggested that ACEIs supress the progression of renal failure or reduce proteinuria [2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10]. However, most of them were based on a short-term follow-up of less than 12 months, and only 3 randomized controlled studies have been conducted for 1 year or longer to evaluate the renoprotective effect of ACEIs in comparison with other antihypertensive agents [8, 9, 10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were reported by some authors to have a specific suppressive effect on the progression of renal failure which cannot be explained by their antihypertensive effect [2, 3, 4]. However, the few long-term prospective randomized studies that assessed the renoprotective effect of ACEIs actually provided no substantial evidence supporting the specific renoprotective effect [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no previous studies [2, 3, 4] on the renal effect of ACEIs were performed in patients on a restricted protein intake.…”
The effect of enalapril (5–10 mg/day) on the progression of chronic renal failure (CRF) was compared with that of metoprolol (40–120 mg/day) in 28 patients for 24 months in a prospective study. Throughout the study, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in protein intake and urinary sodium excretion. But there was a significant difference between the 2 groups in diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure at 6 months. In the serum creatinine level, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. In creatinine clearance, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups at 24 months. In addition, the progression of CRF was significantly faster in the metoprolol group than the enalapril group as estimated from the slope of creatinine clearance (p < 0.05) and the slope of glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.0005). In urinary protein excretion, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups at 6 and 18 months (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that enalapril has a suppressive effect on the progression of CRF and also has an antiproteinuric effect by a mechanism independent of its antihypertensive effect.
“…Concerning the first result, it is known that, in normal subjects and essential hypertensives, ACE inhibition causes an increase in ERPF, with no substantial changes in GFR and FF. In chronic renal failure patients, there have been surprisingly few studies on the effects of acute ACE inhibition; however, from the review of the effects of ACE-I on renal function in non-diabetic chronic renal diseases by ter Wee & Epstein, 3 it can be argued that both GFR and ERPF tend to decrease more in short-term studies (range <1-26 weeks) than in long-term ones (52-156 weeks) with a calculated FET of 0.006 and 0.03 for GFR and ERPF, respectively. Although the comparison of effects seen after hours with those seen after days to weeks of treatment is debatable, our results support the view that the acute and short-term modifications of renal haemodynamics produced by ACE-I are different from the long-term ones, presumably because of the increased intrarenal levels of angiotensin II (Ang II) in circumstances of decreased renal perfusion.This view is supported by the lack of decrease in GFR that we observed after long-term ACE inhibition.…”
Section: Journal Of the Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System (Including Other Peptidergic Systems)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of patients with diabetic and nondiabetic renal diseases with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) reduces urinary protein excretion and may slow the progression of renal failure more than any other antihypertensive treatment. [1][2][3][4] However, not every trial has shown a favourable effect of ACE-I. These contrasting results could depend on different pathophysiological mechanisms of renal failure progression in different nephropathies: for example, in autosomal polycistic kidney disease the protective effect of ACE-I seems to be absent.…”
Renal and glomerular haemodynamic responses are not similar after acute and chronic ACE inhibition. Only patients with glomerular diseases show acute or long-term responses to ACE inhibition.
The incidence of hypertensive end-stage renal disease continues to increase annually. To reduce this incidence, it is necessary to control systolic and diastolic hypertension. Reversible causes should always be sought in any hypertensive patient who develops renal insufficiency. Blood pressure should be reduced to 130/85 mm Hg, and in African Americans with hypertensive renal failure, reducing the blood pressure to 120/75 mm Hg may be beneficial. Any antihypertensive treatment regimen that effectively lowers blood pressure will help slow progressive renal failure. Whenever possible, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor should be part of the treatment, since these drugs have been shown to be renoprotective beyond their antihypertensive effect in certain renal disease categories.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.