2017
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1378325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiogenic factors for prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction onset in high-risk women: AngioPred study

Abstract: In high-risk women, angiogenic factors are disturbed before the onset of preeclampsia and this is true for intrauterine growth restriction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous research (3,16,28,32,36,37) we showed that PlGF concentrations were positively associated to birth weight Z-score, while sFlt-1 concentrations and the sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio were negatively associated to the same outcome. The strongest correlation between angiogenic markers and birth weight were seen in women with preeclampsia or preterm delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In agreement with previous research (3,16,28,32,36,37) we showed that PlGF concentrations were positively associated to birth weight Z-score, while sFlt-1 concentrations and the sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio were negatively associated to the same outcome. The strongest correlation between angiogenic markers and birth weight were seen in women with preeclampsia or preterm delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, more important is the possibility of the drug preventing low birth weight in women at high risk for developing FGR. This potential may be forthcoming, considering that it is possible to determine the probability of developing FGR based on the levels of angiogenic factors in maternal blood [33]. We are still waiting the final results of the STRIDER multicenter trials that are researching sildenafil therapy for early-onset intrauterine growth restriction pregnancies [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second option seems more plausible pathophysiologically. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the risk group for preeclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction, a condition that is fortunately possible, based on the levels of angiogenic factors in maternal blood and uterine Doppler flow [37]. Besides that, Brownfoot et al reported that sildenafil is associated with a reduction in circulating sFlt-1 levels in a patient with preterm preeclampsia [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several candidate predictive markers have been identified in recent years, such as sFLT-1 and soluble endoglin, there are no current means for accurately predicting the risk of severe preeclampsia or the likelihood of preterm delivery in affected cases. 1,[37][38][39] Recent data also suggest that changes in specific haemostatic markers (including coagulation, fibrinolytic and platelet parameters) may be associated with EOP and severe disease, although the predictive values of these observations have also yet to be determined. [40][41][42] The lack of an effective predictive model, along with the lack of effective therapies, poses major challenges for clinicians engaged in the management of this disease and the significant associated burden of morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Introduction Preeclampsia: Pathogenesis Clinical Features Amentioning
confidence: 99%