Anesthesia and Monitoring in Small Laboratory Mammals Used in Anesthesiology, Respiratory and Critical Care Research: A Systematic Review on the Current Reporting in Top-10 Impact Factor Ranked Journals

Abstract

RationaleThis study aimed to investigate the quality of reporting of anesthesia and euthanasia in experimental studies in small laboratory mammals published in the top ten impact factor journals.MethodsA descriptive systematic review was conducted and data was abstracted from the ten highest ranked journals with respect to impact factor in the categories ‘Anesthesiology’, ‘Critical Care Medicine’ and ‘Respiratory System’ as defined by the 2012 Journal Citation Reports. Inclusion criteria according to PICOS criteria were as follows: 1) population: small laboratory mammals; 2) intervention: any form of anesthesia and/or euthanasia; 3) comparison: not specified; 4) primary outcome: type of anesthesia, anesthetic agents and type of euthanasia; secondary outcome: animal characteristics, monitoring, mechanical ventilation, fluid management, postoperative pain therapy, animal care approval, sample size calculation and performed interventions; 5) study: experimental studies. Anesthesia, euthanasia, and monitoring were analyzed per performed intervention in each article.ResultsThe search yielded 845 articles with 1,041 interventions of interest. Throughout the manuscripts we found poor quality and frequency of reporting with respect to completeness of data on animal characteristics as well as euthanasia, while anesthesia (732/1041, 70.3%) and interventions without survival (970/1041, 93.2%) per se were frequently reported. Premedication and neuromuscular blocking agents were reported in 169/732 (23.1%) and 38/732 (5.2%) interventions, respectively. Frequency of reporting of analgesia during (117/610, 19.1%) and after painful procedures (38/364, 10.4%) was low. Euthanasia practice was reported as anesthesia (348/501, 69%), transcardial perfusion (37/501, 8%), carbon dioxide (26/501, 6%), decapitation (22/501, 5%), exsanguination (23/501, 5%), other (25/501, 5%) and not specified (20/501, 4%, respectively.ConclusionsThe present systematic review revealed insufficient reporting of anesthesia and euthanasia methods throughout experimental studies in small laboratory mammals. Specific guidelines for anesthesia and euthanasia regimens should be considered to achieve comparability, quality of animal experiments and animal welfare. These measures are of special interest when translating experimental findings to future clinical applications.

Fast serotonin voltammetry as a versatile tool for mapping dynamic tissue architecture: I. Responses at carbon fibers describe local tissue physiology

“…The percent of animals expected to die because of urethane anesthesia, based on empirical observations from our own laboratory, was about 38% (54 of 141 animals). This number appears high, though research has shown that many studies severely under‐report unexpected death from anesthesia (Uhlig et al ). Urethane is a terminal anesthetic and the dose is difficult to adjust.…”

Apoptosis inhibition is involved in improvement of sevoflurane‑induced cognitive impairment following normobaric hyperoxia preconditioning in aged rats

“…In the present study, a lower chloral hydrate dose (250 mg/kg) was used to anaesthetize the rats in accordance with some previous studies ( 53 , 54 ). Some studies ( 55 , 56 ) use 300-400 mg/kg chloral hydrate to perform surgery or establish animal models, the process of which requires deep anesthesia and long duration.…”

Refinement on the Way Towards Replacement: Are We Doing What We Can?

“…The Use of Experimental Refinements in Practice Several structured and systematic literature reviews have given some insight on certain experimental refinements, notably, killing methods (Pound and Nicol, 2018;Uhlig et al, 2015) and the use of anesthetics and analgesics (Bertrand, Sandersen and Flecknell, 2018;Carbone and Austin, 2016;Coulter, Flecknell and Richardson 2009;Coulter et al, 2011;Pound and Nicol, 2018;Richardson, and Flecknell, 2005;Stokes, Flecknell and Richardson, 2009;Uhlig et al, 2015). For example, animal research involving surgical procedures carried out on diverse species and published in peer-reviewed journals has been analyzed with regard to analgesic and anesthetic administration (Coulter et al, 2011;Coulter, Flecknell and Richardson, 2009;Richardson and Flecknell, 2005).…”

“…A systematic review of anesthesia, analgesia and euthanasia methods used in anesthesiology, respiratory and critical care research in top-10 impact factor ranked journals journals pointed to insufficient reporting of experimental studies with small laboratory mammals. Despite the poor reporting, the review found shortcomings in the application of refinement (Uhlig et al, 2015). Another recent attempt to assess trends in pain management, this time in papers published before 2011 and from 2014 to 2015, further confirmed that reporting (and probably the use) of experimental refinement methods is still poor (Carbone and Austin, 2016).…”