ANDES: An approach to embed search services on the Web browser

Bosetti, Gabriela; Tacuri, Alex; Gambo, Ishaya; Firmenich, Sérgio; Rossi, Gustavo; Winckler, Marco; Fernandez, Alejandro

doi:10.1016/j.csi.2022.103633

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The least common are collaborative development (8) but the ones that have gained the most strength in recent years. Six of the tools that use collaborative development are from 2018 or later [38,[41][42][43][44][45]. Similarly, Figure 9 shows that sharing has lost importance in recent years, as only 3 WA tools use that collaboration feature since 2018 [35,46,47].…”

Section: Rq7: What Is the Most Common Collaboration Feature In Wa?mentioning

confidence: 97%

Web Augmentation: A systematic mapping study

Aldalur

2024

Science of Computer Programming

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Rq7: What Is the Most Common Collaboration Feature In Wa?mentioning

confidence: 97%

Web Augmentation: A systematic mapping study

Aldalur

2024

Science of Computer Programming

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Tere were a number of other specifc approaches to navigating complexity. Tese included the design of a tool to personalise online searching [40]; an approach to integrating IT systems to improve service delivery [47]; a multiuser tool, in the form of an interactive map, for planning home care services [60]; a method for measuring complexity in the brewing industry to better understand the structural and operational issues involved [61]; and the use of smartphones to enable access to health information [77].…”

Section: Testing Interventions To Address Complexitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Supporting Service Recipients to Navigate Complex Service Systems: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review

Davidson,

Allchin,

Blake-Holmes

et al. 2023

Health & Social Care in the Community

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This scoping review aimed to identify potential factors from across eight disciplines’ approaches to complexity that could be positively applied to supporting services users to navigate health and social care. The illustrative example of families where a parent has mental health challenges is used as those families often have a wide range of complex needs both for the parent/s and children. These complexities can result in the involvement of multiple services and interventions. However, in attempting to respond to complex family needs, health and social care services may unintentionally increase the complexity and associated stress for the family. Two broad themes were identified within the multidisciplinary literature including testing service developments with a view to reduce or manage complexity and approaches to support service users to navigate complexity. Specific learning from the scoping review can be applied to health and social care services to encourage a focus on service users’ expectations, understandings, and experiences of services; carefully consider the relationship between the service design and the service user’s behaviour; and finally reinforce the importance of service user involvement (or coproduction) within service development and consideration of the relationship between the service user and provider. The knowledge drawn from this scoping review can inform the development and evaluation of current services and guide the development of future services. It can also help consider approaches to empower service users to navigate the complexity of services.

show abstract

“…The outcome is displayed in a separate browser tab. This approach is akin to proposals for augmenting websites with external search services and in-context results display (Bosetti et al 2022 ).…”

Section: Proof Of Concept: Framendeleymentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing research questions in conversation with the literature: operationalization & tool support

Díaz

Contell

2022

Empir Software Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empirical Software Engineering rests on the understanding of practical problems and their solution counterparts. Frequently, solutions are not absolute but relative to the context where the problem is observed. This tends to imply that the solution and the problem unveil gradually together, and hence, researchers are not always in the position to state the research question (RQ) at the onset. Like software engineers when facing blurred requirements, researchers might not be familiar enough with the problem in the early phases of a research to properly scope their RQs (hereafter referred to as RQ Scoping). Here, the literature may play the role of the stakeholders in Agile methods: keeping the focus on the aspects that are essential (vs. accidental) of the RQ. Informed by Inductive Top-Down Theorizing, this article acknowledges RQ Scoping as iterative and incremental, entailing a conversation between the experimental work and literature reviewing. Yet, for literature reviewing to become “Agile” it is not only required to be driven by the RQ but also to have tool support. Tools might bring transparency and traceability, both factors especially welcome in a scenario characterized by testing (is my RQ relevant?) and adjustment (how can I make my RQ relevant?). Specifically, the advent of the RQ in close relationship with the literature advises for “Agile” literature reviewing to be conducted at the place where the literature is naturally kept: the Reference Management System (e.g., Mendeley). This article introduces the theoretical underpinnings, design principles, proof of concept and evaluation for FRAMEndeley, a Mendeley-integrated utility for RQ Scoping.

show abstract

ANDES: An approach to embed search services on the Web browser

Cited by 6 publications

References 30 publications

Web Augmentation: A systematic mapping study

Web Augmentation: A systematic mapping study

Supporting Service Recipients to Navigate Complex Service Systems: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review

Developing research questions in conversation with the literature: operationalization & tool support

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About