1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(83)90518-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anderson transition and minimum metallic conductivity in disordered two-dimensional systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will not be out of place to state here that the approximations involved in the scaling theory [l] have recently been questioned [13,14]. Also, there are some other independent arguments [15, 161 that deny the validity of the result [l].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will not be out of place to state here that the approximations involved in the scaling theory [l] have recently been questioned [13,14]. Also, there are some other independent arguments [15, 161 that deny the validity of the result [l].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dimensions greater than one is confined to the work by Weaver [12], and, inasmuch as measurements of frequency-frequency intensity correlation functions imply measurements of time domain behavior, that of Genack and Garcia[10,11]. Numerical work in the time domain is reported by Prelovsek [20], Scher [21 ), Shore and Halley [22], Weaver and Loewenherz [23], Weaver [16], and Vanneste et a/. [24].…”
Section: Experimental Work In the Time Domain On Anderson Localization And Anomalous Diffusion Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the bold index n runs over the sites of a large square lattice. The sum is over the four nearest neighbor sites m of site n, and kn is five plus a random number taken from the uniform distribution The evolution of systems like that of equation(S} from specified narrow-band initial conditions has been studied previously [20,21 ]. In this work we numerically study the evolution dictated by equation (1} rather than, like Prelovsek [20] and Scher [21 ], equation (5).…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%