2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancient Maya water management, agriculture, and society in the area of Chactún, Campeche, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even with a conservative approach, considering many complex mounds as a single structure, we obtained about 61 structures/km 2 , whereas in an extensive area of the Guatemalan Pete ´n, the density based on PACUNAM lidar survey turned out to be 29 structures/km 2 [16]. As argued elsewhere [6], the surprising density of archaeological remains in the CHRP area reflects a successful adaptation to the less than optimal environmental conditions, although the Late Classic overexploitation of natural resources combined with unfavorable climatic change led to increased vulnerability and disintegration of the complex sociopolitical structures, which finally resulted in a dramatic demographic decline.…”
Section: Archaeological Characteristics Of the Areamentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, even with a conservative approach, considering many complex mounds as a single structure, we obtained about 61 structures/km 2 , whereas in an extensive area of the Guatemalan Pete ´n, the density based on PACUNAM lidar survey turned out to be 29 structures/km 2 [16]. As argued elsewhere [6], the surprising density of archaeological remains in the CHRP area reflects a successful adaptation to the less than optimal environmental conditions, although the Late Classic overexploitation of natural resources combined with unfavorable climatic change led to increased vulnerability and disintegration of the complex sociopolitical structures, which finally resulted in a dramatic demographic decline.…”
Section: Archaeological Characteristics Of the Areamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…contiguously, either aligned or at different angles with respect to each other. This is another distinctive feature of the CHRP area, making it impossible to delimit individual structures or households and preventing reliable population estimates based on structure count and common in Maya archaeology (it is for this reason that we employed different methods [6]). Both these residential clusters and elongated standalone structures, which are also common, were…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But this misconception runs deep in archaeological practice, especially outside the community of LiDAR data specialists [18,19]. In practice, archaeologists all too often depend on external experts to process the airborne LiDAR data from raw data to visualizations, and sometimes even interpretive mapping is outsourced to non-archaeologists, e.g., [91]. The consequence, as we indicated in the introduction, is that derivatives (for example, DTM visualizations) are most often accepted as facts rather than "facts" (sensu Clarke [22]), which is at least partly the consequence of black-boxing the data processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the real advantages lie in the ability to generate DTMs for further analysis and in the classification of certain types of archaeological standing objects as buildings. The latter is particularly useful, for example, in a situation where standing objects are ubiquitous and modern buildings are absent, e.g., [87][88][89][90][91]. In such morphological contexts, the proposed pipeline (with possible tweaks to the settings) can be used for automatic feature detection at the point cloud level, which has many advantages.…”
Section: Automatic Ground Point and Object-type Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%