2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21365-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anchoring Knowledge in Interaction: Towards a Harmonic Subsymbolic/Symbolic Framework and Architecture of Computational Cognition

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Against this background, in Besold et al (2015) a program has been proposed 530 for 'anchoring knowledge in interaction', aiming at developing, theoretically and practically, a conceptual framework and corresponding architecture that model an agent's knowledge, thinking, and acting truly as interrelated parts of a unified cognitive capacity. That is, knowledge is seen as multi-layered phenomenon that appears at different levels of abstraction, promotes interaction between 535 these levels of abstraction, is influenced by the interaction between agent and environment (potentially including other agents), and is essentially linked to actions, perception, thinking, and being.…”
Section: From Interaction To Knowledge and Backmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this background, in Besold et al (2015) a program has been proposed 530 for 'anchoring knowledge in interaction', aiming at developing, theoretically and practically, a conceptual framework and corresponding architecture that model an agent's knowledge, thinking, and acting truly as interrelated parts of a unified cognitive capacity. That is, knowledge is seen as multi-layered phenomenon that appears at different levels of abstraction, promotes interaction between 535 these levels of abstraction, is influenced by the interaction between agent and environment (potentially including other agents), and is essentially linked to actions, perception, thinking, and being.…”
Section: From Interaction To Knowledge and Backmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the biggest challenges in this context is the (bidirectional) integration between low-level sensing and interacting as well as the formation of high-level knowledge and subsequent reasoning. In (Besold, Kühnberger, Garcez, Saffiotti, Fischer, & Bundy, 2015) an interdisciplinary group of researchers spanning from cognitive psychology through robotics to formal ontology repair and reasoning sketch conceptually (what amounts to) a strongly cognitively-motivated neural-symbolic architecture and model of a situated agent's knowledge acquisition through interaction with the environment in a permanent cycle of learning through experience, higher-order deliberation, and theory formation and revision.…”
Section: Other Research Efforts and Programs Narrowing The Neural-sym...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the distinct components of this challenge are isolated and investigated systematically for the first time, towards a better understanding of the fundamental memory properties of the current state-of-the-art language models based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs). This paper proposes five basic tasks for isolating and examining specific capabilities relating to the implementation of memory in RNNs, and analyses the ability of such networks to solve these problems in order to gain insight into the fundamental intra-cell and inter-cell mechanisms that RNNs learn to employ, thus contributing to the research on the use of RNNs, and focusing particularly on work in the last two years addressing the ability of RNNs to implement memory and perform symbol grounding as well as reasoning [3], [4], [5]. Specifically, the long short term memory (LSTM) cell [3], originally developed to address the vanishing gradient problem, is evaluated in comparison with the gated recurrent unit (GRU) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%