2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy of a closing window: Vulnerability to changing seasonality in Interior Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants identified climate change [31,32], concerns about contamination in the traditional food supply [32] and changing wildlife migration patterns [33,34] as causes of traditional food insecurity. Additional factors included high equipment and fuel prices [35,36] and a loss of traditional knowledge [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Participants identified climate change [31,32], concerns about contamination in the traditional food supply [32] and changing wildlife migration patterns [33,34] as causes of traditional food insecurity. Additional factors included high equipment and fuel prices [35,36] and a loss of traditional knowledge [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the eight qualitative food security studies, one was conducted in an urban area [34] and those remaining seven were conducted in rural communities (Table 1). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Multiple qualitative and quantitative methods are used to understand climate vulnerability, including case studies and analogue analyses, scenario analyses, sensitivity analyses, peer information sharing, monitoring of key species, and information sharing among peers (Barrett et al 2011;EPA 2011;Ford et al 2010;Fussel 2007;Hulme and Dessai 2008;NPS 2010). Participatory research and "on the ground" efforts in places such as New York City, Boston, Flagstaff, Interior Alaska, and in the Swinomish Tribe demonstrate the importance of starting with the identification of existing vulnerabilities (City of Flagstaff 2012; Lamb and Davis 2011;McNeeley and Shulski 2011;Rosenzweig et al 2011b). Relevant historical and future climate data are often then used to conduct a risk and/or vulnerability analysis; such efforts have been used in the water utility (Berry et al 2011), land and ecosystems management (Glick et al 2011;Heller and Zavaleta 2009;NPS 2010;USGS 2012), and government sectors (Pahl-Wostl et al 2011;Wheeler 2008 context-relevant adaptation activities for implementation (Means et al 2010;NRC 2010a).…”
Section: Identifying and Understanding Risk Vulnerabilities And Oppmentioning
confidence: 99%