Anatomical re-evaluation of the corticostriatal projections to the caudate nucleus: a retrograde labeling study in the cat

Rosell, A.; Giménez‐Amaya, José Manuel

doi:10.1016/s0168-0102(99)00060-7

Cited by 18 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, our analysis supports and extends previous works on the corticocaudate projections in carnivores (Oka, 1980;Tanaka et al, 1981;Royce, 1982Royce, , 1983Tanaka, 1983Tanaka, , 1987aFisher et al, 1986;Kubozono et al, 1986;Norita et al, 1991;Updyke, 1993;Rosell and Giménez-Amaya, 1999). Thus, the present work largely confirms that the cat caudate nucleus receives abundant projections from the frontal and parieto-temporal cortices with a topographical organization (Carman et al, 1965;Webster, 1965;Powell et al, 1974;Graybiel, 1981, 1990;Royce, 1982Royce, , 1983Room et al, 1985;Adinolfi and Levine, 1986;Kubozono et al, 1986;Malach and Graybiel, 1986;Updyke and Liles, 1987;Miyashita and Tamai, 1990;Norita et al, 1991;Updyke, 1993;Rosell and Giménez-Amaya, 1999).…”

Section: Cortical Organization Of the Corticocaudate Projections In Tsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Almost the entire cerebral neocortex projects to the striatum, although the contribution of the different cortical areas varies (Giménez-Amaya, 1991;Parent and Hazrati, 1995;Smith et al, 1998). These projections show some degree of topographical organization and in most cases corticostriatal neurons appear to innervate the striatum in an irregular patchy configuration (see, e.g., Selemon and Goldman-Rakic, 1985;McGeorge and Faull, 1989;Saint-Cyr et al, 1990;Cavada and Goldman-Rakic, 1991;Graybiel, 1991, 1995;Berendse et al, 1992;Parthasarathy et al, 1992;Updyke, 1993;Parent and Hazrati, 1995;Yeterian and Pandya, 1995;Inase et al, 1996;Kincaid and Wilson, 1996;Alloway et al, 1998;Kincaid et al, 1998;Lévesque and Parent, 1998;Takada et al, 1998a,b;Yeterian and Pandya, 1998;Rosell and Giménez-Amaya, 1999).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the cat, corticostriatal neurons have been found in both supragranular and infragranular layers (Oka, 1980;Royce, 1982;Kubozono et al, 1986;Updyke, 1993;Rosell and Giménez-Amaya, 1999). These projections have been described as bilateral, although the ipsilateral contribution is more abundant (Oka, 1980;Royce, 1982;Kubozono et al, 1986;Updyke, 1993;Rosell and Giménez-Amaya, 1999).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These projections have been described as bilateral, although the ipsilateral contribution is more abundant (Oka, 1980;Royce, 1982;Kubozono et al, 1986;Updyke, 1993;Rosell and Giménez-Amaya, 1999). The number of single corticostriatal cells that project bilaterally to the ipsilateral and contralateral striata is relatively small when compared to the total number of corticostriatal neurons (Royce and Bromley, 1984).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Double retrograde tracer study of the corticostriatal projections to the cat caudate nucleus

Rosell

Giménez‐Amaya

2001

Synapse

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Cortical Organization Of the Corticocaudate Projections In Tsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Double retrograde tracer study of the corticostriatal projections to the cat caudate nucleus

Rosell

Giménez‐Amaya

2001

Synapse

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Arikuni and Kubota (1986) showed that retrograde injections into the ventromedial caudate of the monkey striatum lead to tracer uptake distributed in the OFC, lateral frontal lobe, and temporal lobe (parietal and medial frontal cortices were not reported). In the cat, Rosell and Gimenez-Amaya (1999) showed that retrograde injections in the dorsal anterior caudate result in labeled neurons in distributed frontal, parietal, and temporal cortices. In a comprehensive set of tracings in the rat, McGeorge and Faull (1989) showed that retrograde injections in the striatum lead to tracer uptake in distributed regions of the neocortex, mesocortex, and allocortex.…”

Section: Basis Of Striatal Coupling To Distributed Cerebral Regionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity

Choi

Yeo

Buckner

2012

Journal of Neurophysiology

687

658

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Choi EY, Yeo BT, Buckner RL. The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 108: 2242-2263, 2012. First published July 25, 2012 doi:10.1152/jn.00270.2012.-The striatum is connected to the cerebral cortex through multiple anatomical loops that process sensory, limbic, and heteromodal information. Tract-tracing studies in the monkey reveal that these corticostriatal connections form stereotyped patterns in the striatum. Here the organization of the striatum was explored in the human with resting-state functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI). Data from 1,000 subjects were registered with nonlinear deformation of the striatum in combination with surface-based alignment of the cerebral cortex. fcMRI maps derived from seed regions placed in the foot and tongue representations of the motor cortex yielded the expected inverted somatotopy in the putamen. fcMRI maps derived from the supplementary motor area were located medially to the primary motor representation, also consistent with anatomical studies. The topography of the complete striatum was estimated and replicated by assigning each voxel in the striatum to its most strongly correlated cortical network in two independent groups of 500 subjects. The results revealed at least five cortical zones in the striatum linked to sensorimotor, premotor, limbic, and two association networks with a topography globally consistent with monkey anatomical studies. The majority of the human striatum was coupled to cortical association networks. Examining these association networks further revealed details that fractionated the five major networks. The resulting estimates of striatal organization provide a reference for exploring how the striatum contributes to processing motor, limbic, and heteromodal information through multiple large-scale corticostriatal circuits. somatotopy; limbic network; prefrontal cortex; association cortex; fMRI; functional connectivity; default network ANIMAL STUDIES and human patient cases demonstrate that the basal ganglia are involved in diverse functional domains including movement, cognition, and reward (Alexander et al. 1986;DeLong and Georgopoulos 1981;Haber and Gdowski 2004;MacLean 1972). Providing an anatomical basis for functional diversity, tract-tracing studies show that the basal ganglia are connected to distributed regions of the cerebral cortex through multiple, partially parallel anatomical loops (Alexander et al. 1986(Alexander et al. , 1990. Each loop includes projections from the cerebral cortex, through the basal ganglia, to the thalamus, and back to the cerebral cortex. Cortical efferents to the striatum (the main input nucleus of the basal ganglia) form distinct patterns depending on their cortical origin. The posterior putamen and the dorsolateral anterior putamen receive projections from motor and motor association cortex, the central anterior striatum from cognitive regions including prefrontal cortex, and the ventral anterior striatum from regions associated with the limbic syste...

show abstract

Laminar and connectional organization of a multisensory cortex

Foxworthy

Clemo

Meredith

2013

J of Comparative Neurology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The transformation of sensory signals as they pass through cortical circuits has been revealed almost exclusively through studies of the primary sensory cortices, where principles of laminar organization, local connectivity and parallel processing have been elucidated. In contrast, almost nothing is known about the circuitry or laminar features of multisensory processing in higher-order, multisensory cortex. Therefore, using the ferret higher-order multisensory rostral posterior parietal (PPr) cortex, the present investigation employed a combination of multichannel recording and neuroanatomical techniques to elucidate the laminar basis of multisensory cortical processing. The proportion of multisensory neurons, the share of neurons showing multisensory integration, and the magnitude of multisensory integration were all found to differ by layer in a way that matched the functional or connectional characteristics of the PPr. Specifically, the supragranular layers (L2–3) demonstrated among the highest proportions of multisensory neurons and the highest incidence of multisensory response enhancement, while also receiving the highest levels of extrinsic inputs, exhibiting the highest dendritic spine densities, and providing a major source of local connectivity. In contrast, layer 6 showed the highest proportion of unisensory neurons while receiving the fewest external and local projections and exhibiting the lowest dendritic spine densities. Coupled with a lack of input from principal thalamic nuclei and a minimal layer 4, these observations indicate that this higher-level multisensory cortex shows unique functional and organizational modifications from the well-known patterns identified for primary sensory cortical regions.

show abstract

Anatomical re-evaluation of the corticostriatal projections to the caudate nucleus: a retrograde labeling study in the cat

Cited by 18 publications

References 40 publications

Double retrograde tracer study of the corticostriatal projections to the cat caudate nucleus

Double retrograde tracer study of the corticostriatal projections to the cat caudate nucleus

The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity

Laminar and connectional organization of a multisensory cortex

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About