1998
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical Congruence of Metabolic and Electromagnetic Activation Signals during a Self-Paced Motor Task: A Combined PET–MEG Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Localization was not influenced by active tDCS (average deviation: 4.56 ±2.89 mm) (Fig. 5b), and results matched with findings in other neuroimaging studies 34,35 . Task-related signal source changes (for example, rolandic alpha desynchronization before or beta synchronization after button press) in the absence of and during DC stimulation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Localization was not influenced by active tDCS (average deviation: 4.56 ±2.89 mm) (Fig. 5b), and results matched with findings in other neuroimaging studies 34,35 . Task-related signal source changes (for example, rolandic alpha desynchronization before or beta synchronization after button press) in the absence of and during DC stimulation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Multimodal studies performed by different groups showed similar findings of MEG and fMRI [Inoue et al, 1999;Morioka et al, 1995;Nimsky et al, 1999;Stippich et al, 1998], MEG and PET [Joliot et al, 1998], as well as MEG and intraoperative electrocorticography Roberts et al, 1995]. These findings underline the validity of the SEF and MEF localization results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Techniques with high spatial (fMRI) and high temporal (MEG) resolution have been advantageously combined before (Northoff, Richter, et al, 2000;Heinze et al, 1994), particularly in movements (Joliot et al, 1998;Stippich et al, 1998;Sanders, Lewine, & Orrison, 1996). Though there are several methodological problems applying two techniques with different neurophysiological substrates, blood oxygenic (fMRI) and electromagnetic (MEG) activity, the above-cited studies have nevertheless shown high coincidence between both kinds of signals (Northoff, Richter, et al, 2000;Joliot et al, 1998;Stippich et al, 1998;Sanders et al, 1996;Heinze et al, 1994). Consequently, combining spatial and temporal measures with fMRI and MEG may further reveal similarities and differences in physiological mechanisms in negative and positive emotional processing.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%