2001
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.1056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approach to localize speech relevant brain areas and hemispheric dominance using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography

Abstract: We used a current localization by spatial filtering-technique to determine primary language areas with magnetoencephalography (MEG) using a silent reading and a silent naming task. In all cases we could localize the sensory speech area (Wernicke) in the posterior part of the left superior temporal gyrus (Brodmann area 22) and the motor speech area (Broca) in the left inferior frontal gyrus (Brodmann area 44). Left hemispheric speech dominance was determined in all cases by a laterality index comparing the curr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, whereas Thierry et al observed a primacy for Wernicke's over Broca's area, the reversed pattern was found for production in the present study, with the mean temporal delay between the two peaks being identical (B3 s). This result clearly speaks against the hypothesis of a general primacy for Wernicke's area that might have been supposed on the grounds of the reported studies [19,21]. Rather, the present data suggest that the cortical network for phonological processing is identical for production and comprehension with respect to the regions involved but characterised by a variable dynamics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, whereas Thierry et al observed a primacy for Wernicke's over Broca's area, the reversed pattern was found for production in the present study, with the mean temporal delay between the two peaks being identical (B3 s). This result clearly speaks against the hypothesis of a general primacy for Wernicke's area that might have been supposed on the grounds of the reported studies [19,21]. Rather, the present data suggest that the cortical network for phonological processing is identical for production and comprehension with respect to the regions involved but characterised by a variable dynamics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Evidence for the fact that the neural activity in Wernicke's area also precedes that in Broca's area during language production was provided by Kober et al [21] by means of a MEG dipole analysis. In two tasks (silent naming, silent reading), the authors observed a temporal primacy for the activity in Wernicke's area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The development of MEG protocols to study expressive language has been more challenging for a number of reasons, the primary one being the computational limitations of the traditional dipole source localization method [14]. Advances in source localization methods have addressed this issue, and several groups have reported identifying Broca's area in adults [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, to shed light on the time course of processing in visual word recognition, visual recognition of heteronymous-phonological and semantically distinct words that share a common orthography, providing a unique opportunity to distinguish between lexical and word form properties, were examined with MEG, finding results that suggest that true lexical access does not occur prior to 200 ms, but rather at a latter stage of processing (Solomyak & Marantz, 2009). A covert name and covert reading task concluded that MEG is a valuable tool to investigate both the time course of speech-evoked cortex activation as well as the localization of the main speech areas (Kober et al, 2001). The N400 component has also been addressed with MEG.…”
Section: Language and Megmentioning
confidence: 99%