Analyzing Youth’s Activity Patterns in Campus Open Spaces Depending on Their Personal and Social Needs

Düzenli, Tuğba; Mumcu, Sema; Yılmaz, Serap; Özbilen, Ali

doi:10.1007/s10804-012-9147-1

Cited by 8 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One study in this literature review, Düzenli et al (2012), presented empirical evidence using direct observations. Two further studies, Ahmad and Ingle (2011) and Capdevila (2015), included observations in a mixed methods approach.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…People need to feel comfortable and at ease in a space, to make them more likely to linger and engage in interactions with others (Burlage and Brase, 1995; Halsband, 2005). The level of comfort in a space can be improved by integrating the following aspects into the design: Seating : providing campus users with the opportunity to sit, relax and talk to each other by providing benches or other seating areas is mentioned in several studies (Burlage and Brase, 1995; Düzenli et al , 2012; Göçer et al , 2018; Halsband, 2005; Marcus and Francis, 1998; O’Rourke and Baldwin, 2016). Enclosure : people like to be in charge of their own personal space and the interactions they engage in.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Critical success factors for campus interaction spaces and services – a systematic literature review

Jansz¹,

Mobach²,

Dijk

2020

JFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to create an overview of current literature and identify gaps in what is known about stimulating interaction through spaces and services provided on university campuses. Design/methodology/approach The authors used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement methodology for systematic literature review. In total, 3,616 articles were screened, 31 articles were included. Facility Directors from 13 Dutch Universities were asked to define the search terms related to services. Findings Spaces and services were mostly studied separately. The majority of papers (18/31) were based on perceptions (surveys or interviews). The following critical success factors were identified in the literature: geographic proximity, cognitive proximity, scale, transitional spaces, comfort and experience, shared facilities and events, local buzz and networks. These factors are interrelated. The authors present a new relational model, from spaces and services, through interaction to innovation, visualising how the identified papers are related. Research limitations/implications The scope of possible findings may have been narrowed because prior relevant studies were rather limited and as a consequence of the search strategy designed to limit the number of unrelated hits. Some knowledge gaps may not have been identified, as only a few mainstream concepts related to the critical success factors were used for comparison. Nevertheless, the literature review provides a reliable overview of current academic knowledge regarding critical success factors for spaces and services that stimulate interaction on campuses. Originality/value This paper offers a novel perspective by emphasising the relational chain from interaction to innovation, visualising the large diversity in research fields and summarising the critical success factors in the literature.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical success factors for campus interaction spaces and services – a systematic literature review

Jansz¹,

Mobach²,

Dijk

2020

JFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It should be noted that adolescents and youths attach great importance to loyalty and group solidarity. They live in fear of being isolated from reference groups, and therefore exhibit conformal behavior (Duzenli et al, 2012). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.11.02.45 Corresponding Author: Olga V. Kobzeva Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference eISSN: 2357-1330…”

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If they do not become members of the reference group, then they do not identify themselves with its social space. Friendships contribute significantly to the social and cognitive development of an individual (Duzenli et al, 2012). Furthermore, social space by teenagers and youth determines the structural components, the focus, and acceptance of the socio-cultural identity by an individual (Kobzeva, 2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assumptions Of Social Space In Adolescence And Youth

Kobzeva¹

2020

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The feeling of private life develops. Thus, they have different demands and needs from children or adults (Düzenli et al 2012;Karman et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Li̇se Bahçeleri̇ni̇n Gençler Tarafindan Algisal Açidan Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇

Düzenli¹

2017

IBAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genç gelişiminin çok boyutlu olması (biyolojik, psikolojik, kişisel ve toplumsal) gençliğin sınırlarının net bir şekilde belirlenmesini engellemektedir. Gençlik için yaş sınırı, genelde 12-21 yaş arası kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada lise gençliği ele alınarak, lise öğrencilerinin mekânın özelliklerine göre orayı algıla ve beğenme ilişkisi ortaya konmuştur. Lise gençliği üzerinde çalışma yapmak ve onların sorunlarını, ihtiyaçlarını mekânsal algılarını belirlemek, için, bulunulan toplumun hem mevcut durumunun hem de geleceğinin daha iyi anlaşılması önem taşımaktadır. Lise gençliği genel olarak 13-18 yas grubunu oluşturan ve kendine özgü kültürü olan bir toplumsal kesim olarak tanımlanır. Zamanlarının çoğunu okulda geçirmek zorunda olan lise gençleri, okul ve bahçesiyle yakın ilişki içerisinde oldukları için okul bahçelerinin onların gelişimi üzerinde büyük bir etkisi vardır. Bu nedenle çalışmada önce Trabzon kentindeki farklı mekânsal özelliklere sahip iki lisenin bahçesi puantaj tablosuna göre değerlendirilerek sınıflandırılmıştır. Daha sonra gençlere sıfat çiftleri verilerek okul bahçeleri 5 li likert skalasıyla algısal açıdan değerlendirilmiştir. Bu sayede gençlerin gözünde lise bahçeleri tanımlanmıştır. Sonuçta; mekânsal özellikler iyileştikçe lise bahçeleri olumlu algısal özellikler ile tanımlanmış, bu da gençlerin o mekâna karşı beğeni düzeyini arttırmıştır.

show abstract

Analyzing Youth’s Activity Patterns in Campus Open Spaces Depending on Their Personal and Social Needs

Cited by 8 publications

References 8 publications

Critical success factors for campus interaction spaces and services – a systematic literature review

Critical success factors for campus interaction spaces and services – a systematic literature review

Assumptions Of Social Space In Adolescence And Youth

Li̇se Bahçeleri̇ni̇n Gençler Tarafindan Algisal Açidan Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About