2010
DOI: 10.5121/ijcses.2010.1102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing The Manet Variations, Challenges, Capacity And Protocal Issues

Abstract: Various deployment ways of mobile ad hoc networks (MANETS) can have widely varying characteristics that have a greater impact on the behaviour of different routing protocols created for these networks. Before directly deploying the applications in such environments, it is most important for developers to understand the potential quantitative behaviour of the variations, challenges, capacity and implementation issues that support their applications. Analytical models exist to describe the behaviour of MANETS, b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before directly deploying the applications in such environments, it was most important for developers to understand the potential quantitative behavior of the variations, challenges, capacity and implementation issues that supported their applications. Analytical models exist to describe the behavior of MANETS, but they were restricted to simplistic statistical models that represent either node mobility or link connectivity individually without considering the interplay of the two and other important aspects of MANETs [11]. Maghsoudlou A. et al [2011] surveyed on the different face routing algorithms as well as different face routing strategies and greedy routing algorithms under the geographical routing protocol in MANET.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before directly deploying the applications in such environments, it was most important for developers to understand the potential quantitative behavior of the variations, challenges, capacity and implementation issues that supported their applications. Analytical models exist to describe the behavior of MANETS, but they were restricted to simplistic statistical models that represent either node mobility or link connectivity individually without considering the interplay of the two and other important aspects of MANETs [11]. Maghsoudlou A. et al [2011] surveyed on the different face routing algorithms as well as different face routing strategies and greedy routing algorithms under the geographical routing protocol in MANET.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A malicious node can silently drop some or all of the data packets sent to it for further forwarding even when no congestion occurs. Malicious packet dropping attack presents a new threat to wireless adhoc networks since they lack physical protection and strong access control mechanism [2]. An adversary can easily join the network or capture a mobile node and then starts to disrupt network communication by silently dropping packets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also because of the multiple access, fading noise and interference condition it's the wireless links which have lower throughout [6].…”
Section: Quality Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%