2011
DOI: 10.5897/ijps11.344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the geometric accuracy of simple shaped reference object models created by terrestrial laser scanners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used an Optech ILRIS 3D (wavelength: 1,500 nm). The scanning distance was~270 m, which is within the device range of 500 to 600 m. According to the manufacturer, the precision of the obtained model is 7 mm for the distance and 8 mm for the position at 100 m. There is a lack of critical review of the ILRIS 3D characteristics, but this precision remains consistent with different tests done with other scanners Leica, Mensi, Riegl, Faro, or Z+F (Boehler, Bordas Vicent, & Marbs, 2003;Gordon, Lichti, Stewart, & Tsakiri, 2000;Gumus & Erkaya, 2011).…”
Section: Terrestrial Laser Scanningsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We used an Optech ILRIS 3D (wavelength: 1,500 nm). The scanning distance was~270 m, which is within the device range of 500 to 600 m. According to the manufacturer, the precision of the obtained model is 7 mm for the distance and 8 mm for the position at 100 m. There is a lack of critical review of the ILRIS 3D characteristics, but this precision remains consistent with different tests done with other scanners Leica, Mensi, Riegl, Faro, or Z+F (Boehler, Bordas Vicent, & Marbs, 2003;Gordon, Lichti, Stewart, & Tsakiri, 2000;Gumus & Erkaya, 2011).…”
Section: Terrestrial Laser Scanningsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Investigation and analysis of errors occurring in measurements from pulsed timeof-flight TLS was carried out by Reshetyuk (2006) and Gottwald (2008). Gumus and Erkaya (2011) focused on the investigation of the positioning accuracy of TLS using 3D models obtained from point cloud data and Fernández Pareja et al (2013) who presented a procedure for assessing the quality of the TLS measurements and in order to estimate an uncertainty value for the points in the cloud. In recent years, the method of selfcalibration has been a popular approach for laser scanner calibration (e.g., Parian and Gruen 2005, Lichti and Licht 2006, Lichti 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early TLS accuracy studies, prismatic objects have been measured and compared [84][85][86][87] to either nominal or reference values to evaluate TLS systems. More careful metrological performance evaluation with carefully constructed artifacts has also been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Pre-calibrated Artifact-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%