Middle Powers in Global Governance 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72365-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing “T” in MIKTA: Turkey’s Changing Middle Power Role in the United Nations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most scholars have accepted a definition of MIKTA countries as emerging middle powers based not only on their material (positional) power, but also on behavioural and ideational aspects (Cooper, 2015, Dal and Kurşun, 2016, Gök and Karadeniz, 2018. As seen from the table below they are the second top ten countries in terms of material capabilities in G20.…”
Section: Mikta and The Debate On Its Role In Global Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most scholars have accepted a definition of MIKTA countries as emerging middle powers based not only on their material (positional) power, but also on behavioural and ideational aspects (Cooper, 2015, Dal and Kurşun, 2016, Gök and Karadeniz, 2018. As seen from the table below they are the second top ten countries in terms of material capabilities in G20.…”
Section: Mikta and The Debate On Its Role In Global Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…and creating MIKTA. They pointed that MIKTA members underlined related niche areas in global governance to pull their efforts together seen in Table2(Gök and Karadeniz, 2018;Gök and Karadeniz, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%