2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-0967-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing students’ performance using multi-criteria classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The different techniques used in the student performance predictions are compared with RFBTRF-GWO method. The classifiers such as Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest, and DTFMC [15] are compared with the proposed method in Table 5. The RFBTRF-GWO method has the highest performance compared to the other classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The different techniques used in the student performance predictions are compared with RFBTRF-GWO method. The classifiers such as Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest, and DTFMC [15] are compared with the proposed method in Table 5. The RFBTRF-GWO method has the highest performance compared to the other classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feras Al-Obeidat, et al [15] developed hybrid technique of decision tree and fuzzy multi-criteria classification in the student academic prediction. There are several factors used to analyze the performance of the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa teknik FMADM yang digunakan antara lain SAW, Weighted Product (WP), Electre, TOPSIS, dan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Beberapa penelitian menunjukkan bahwa teknik FMADM memberikan alternatif solusi paling optimal pada permasalahan-permasalahan akademik, seperti memprediksi kinerja siswa [10], pengambilan keputusan penerimaan beasiswa [11], penjurusan siswa terkendala [12], dan menetapkan prosedur seleksi mahasiswa baru berdasarkan serangkaian kriteria [13]. Kinerja FMADM dapat dioptimasi dengan mengintegrasikan beberapa teknik yang ada, seperti teknik SAW, TOPSIS, dan Borda, sehingga menghasilkan keputusan yang paling menguntungkan dalam memilih tools untuk meminimalkan sumber daya produksi [14].…”
Section: Pendahuluan Dalam Menyongsong Era Bonus Demografi Dan Menunclassified
“…Koefisien korelasi rank Spearman menunjukkan kekuatan hubungan tiga teknik FMADM yang dibandingkan. Dengan menggunakan (10), koefisien korelasi rank Spearman ketiga teknik FMADM dapat diekspresikan dalam Tabel III.…”
Section: Evaluasi Dataunclassified
“…For both of the datasets (mathematics and Portuguese), you will hardly get any better than 50% accuracy. Depending on the data preprocessing the analyst can obtain better results like in [3] or [4] but still the last grade (G3) depends on G1 and G2.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%