Analyzing Software Product Innovation Assessment by Using a Systematic Literature Review

Yagüe, Agustín; Garbajosa, Juan; Pérez, Jennifer; Díaz, Jessica

doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.620

Cited by 6 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the software engineering domain, our previous work found several systematic literature reviews have been performed to aggregate different aspect of innovation (Edison et al, 2016). Through a systematic review, Yagüe et al (2014) reported the existing assessment schemes applicable to software product innovation. In addition, Munir et al (2015) presented a review on open innovation.…”

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation Initiatives in Large Software Companies: A Systematic Mapping Study

Edison

Jabangwe

Abrahamsson

2018

Information and Software Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: To keep the competitive advantage and adapt to changes in the market and technology, companies need to innovate in an organised, purposeful and systematic manner. However, due to their size and complexity, large companies tend to focus on the structure in maintaining their business, which can potentially lower their agility to innovate.Objective: The aims of this study are to provide an overview of the current research on innovation initiatives and to identify the challenges of implementing those initiatives in the context of large software companies.Method: The investigation was primarily performed using a systematic mapping approach of published literature on corporate innovation and en-

show abstract

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation Initiatives in Large Software Companies: A Systematic Mapping Study

Edison

Jabangwe

Abrahamsson

2018

Information and Software Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The assessment criteria are from the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) for qualitative assessment [32]. Based on the CASP, we set the following questions for this assessment [30]: i) is there a clear statement of the aims and objectives of the research? ; ii) is there an adequate description of the context in which the research was carried out?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on hypertension diagnosis using expert system and wearable devices

Sani¹,

Abdullah

Rosli

2022

IJECE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<span>The popularity of smartphones and wearable devices is increasing in the global market. These devices track physical exercise records, heartbeat, medicines, and self-health diagnosis. The wearable devices can also collect personal health parameters include hypertension diagnosis. Hypertension is one of the risk factors for cardiovascular-related diseases among the Malaysian population. Many mobile applications are paired with wearable devices to monitor health conditions, but none of them able to diagnose hypertension. In this study, we reviewed research papers that focused on hypertension using expert systems and wearable devices. We performed a systematic literature review based on hypertension factors, expert systems, and wearable devices. We found 15 specific research papers after the filtering process. The key findings highlighted three main focuses, which are the factors of hypertension, the expert system techniques, and the types of sensors in wearable devices. Blood pressure is the most common factor of hypertension that can be collected by wearable devices. As for the expert system techniques, we determined the three most common techniques are machine learning, neural network, and fuzzy logic. Lastly, the wrist band is the most common sensor for wearable devices in hypertension-related research.</span>

show abstract

“…The main objective of this exploratory job was to identify if a model for software intensive systems innovation assessment had been developed, or, otherwise, if software intensive systems innovation characteristics had been assessed using a general purpose model. What was found as a result of the SLR performed and already reported in [117], is that no specific assessment model was available for Software intensive Systems. At this stage of the research the decision made was to carry on the job of analysing existing innovation assessment models, available in literature, usually non-specific to a concrete industry, to identify model elements, or even the better building a reference model that could be the basis to assess software intensive systems.…”

Section: Overall Strategymentioning

confidence: 96%

“…This tool called Product Innovation Assessment Tool (PIA-Tool) is still under development that is, PIA-Tool will cover the whole process, but in the scope of this thesis it includes the implementation of the assessment questionnaires representation to provide a support for data gathering, and then the application of these collected data to positioning the product from the innovation perspective. Even considering that there is no agreement whether factors should be qualitative or quantitative, in this thesis and based on the findings obtained in the SLR performed [117], we decided to use qualitative values to represent innovation factors because data collection with these type of data is simpler for survey respondents than quantitative data. Following the recommendations of Tsai [103], factors are represented by discrete values and the criterion scale proposed is VP: Very Poor, P:Poor, F: Fair, G: Good and VG: Very Good.…”

Section: The Assessment and Positioning Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was later described in 2005 that companies were investing efforts adopting innovation factors but, the results were not always successful due to lack of consensus on the impact of each factor, as Sun et al described [96]. As it 1.3: Type of sources considered in the articles included in [117] was reported by McKinsey [98] companies applied assessment mechanisms to diagnose and improve overall innovation performance. Therefore, to increase their chances in leading the market, firms need to assess their software products to determine as soon as possible if they are aligned with the market.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Caracterización de Sistemas intensivos en Software desde un punto de vista de innovación=Characterizing Software-intensive Systems from the innovation point of view

Panadero¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation in Software intensive Systems is becoming relevant for several reasons: software is present embedded in many sectors like automotive, robotics, mobile phones or heath care. Firms need to have knowledge about factors affecting the innovation to increase the probability of success in their product development and the assessment of innovation in software products is a powerful mechanism to capture this knowledge. Therefore, companies need to assess products from an innovation perspective to reduce the gap between their developed products and the market. This is even more relevant in the case of SiSs, where real time, timeliness, complexity, interoperability, reactivity, and resource sharing are critical features of a new system. Many authors have analysed product innovation assessment and some schemas have been developed but they are not specific to SiSs; in addition, there is no consensus about the factors or the procedures for performing an assessment. Therefore, it has sense to work in the definition of a customized software product innovation evaluation framework. This thesis identifies the elements needed to build a framework to assess software products from the innovation perspective. Two components have been identified as part of the framework to assess Software intensive Systems from the innovation perspective: a reference-model and an adaptive and customizable tool to perform the assessment and to position product innovation. The reference-model is composed by four main elements characterizing product innovation assessment: concepts, innovation models, assessment questionnaires and product assessment. The reference model provides the umbrella to define instances of product innovation assessment models that can be assessed and positioned through questionnaires in the proposed tool that also provides automation in the assessment and positioning of innovation. The reference-model has been rigorously built by applying conceptual modelling and view integration integrated with qualitative research methods.The tool has been used to assess products like Skype through models instantiated from the reference-model.

show abstract

Analyzing Software Product Innovation Assessment by Using a Systematic Literature Review

Cited by 6 publications

References 29 publications

Innovation Initiatives in Large Software Companies: A Systematic Mapping Study

Innovation Initiatives in Large Software Companies: A Systematic Mapping Study

Review on hypertension diagnosis using expert system and wearable devices

Caracterización de Sistemas intensivos en Software desde un punto de vista de innovación=Characterizing Software-intensive Systems from the innovation point of view

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About