2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing socio-technical risks in implementation of Industry 4.0-use cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of some previous opposing indications from some researchers, the fact that we found some negative effects of the interaction Industry 4.0's effect on workers' performance between I4.0 technologies and ST practices highlights the necessity of a more humancentered approach when digitalizing organizations as suggested by Kandler et al (2021). Such unexpected effects converge to the concept of ST risk analysis (Gabriel et al, 2021) and readiness (Sitepu et al, 2020), emphasizing that the integration of I4.0 technologies may raise additional ST challenges.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationscontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regardless of some previous opposing indications from some researchers, the fact that we found some negative effects of the interaction Industry 4.0's effect on workers' performance between I4.0 technologies and ST practices highlights the necessity of a more humancentered approach when digitalizing organizations as suggested by Kandler et al (2021). Such unexpected effects converge to the concept of ST risk analysis (Gabriel et al, 2021) and readiness (Sitepu et al, 2020), emphasizing that the integration of I4.0 technologies may raise additional ST challenges.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…(2021). Such unexpected effects converge to the concept of ST risk analysis (Gabriel et al. , 2021) and readiness (Sitepu et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Risks relating to employee and organisation are crucial in implementing risks management. The socio-technical aspect of risks management is required to address the dimensions of human, organisation, and technology and to take their interaction with one another into account [139]. Given this a priority can improve easy identification of potential risks and unsafe site practices on construction sites.…”
Section: Socio-technical Considerations Of Risks Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the science of information delivery is traced back to humans which forms a significant part of the concept of the socio-technical aspect of construction risk management. Projects using digital technologies must be designed and optimised in a way that considers organisational structures, technology and humans to achieve risk-free outcomes [139] because a task is always implemented by the interaction of a human, technology, and organisation [140]. Additionally, [141] agrees to the understanding of a socio-technical perspective which involve human (collaboration, qualifications, work assignment, and structures), organisational (knowledge, organisation & processes, culture, and ethics), and technological innovations (IT systems, automation, data science and management).…”
Section: Socio-technical Considerations Of Risks Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing Industry 4.0 in a company is also associated with risks. Our method delivers a first approach to deal with these risks that suits the scope of the method, but further research into this topic seems promising and necessary (c.f., [44,78]). Future research should focus on methods and approaches, that support these tasks.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%