2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-18029-3_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Sentiment in a Large Set of Web Data While Accounting for Negation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybrid approaches may realize the aggregation through a machine learning process as well [29]. In this sentiment scoring process, other aspects of content may be taken into account as well, such as negation [27,43], intensification [28], or the rhetorical roles of text segments [26,31].…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hybrid approaches may realize the aggregation through a machine learning process as well [29]. In this sentiment scoring process, other aspects of content may be taken into account as well, such as negation [27,43], intensification [28], or the rhetorical roles of text segments [26,31].…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical approaches involve scanning a text for cues signaling its polarity, e.g., (parts of) words or other (latent) features of natural language text. Lexicon-based sentiment analysis methods have gained (renewed) attention in recent work [23][24][25][26][27][28][29], not in the least because their performance has been shown to be robust across domains and texts [30]. Such methods essentially rely on lexical resources containing words and their associated sentiment, i.e., sentiment lexicons, and their nature allows for intuitive ways of accounting for structural or semantic aspects of text in sentiment analysis [26,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the domain-dependent methods, this approach uses lexicon-based vectors to calculate the orientation of documents on the basis of the aggregation of the individual word scores (Turney, 2002). Such approaches have gained attention in more recent research because their performance is robust across texts and domains (Heerschop, van Iterson, Hogenboom, Frasincar, & Kaymak, 2011;Hogenboom et al, 2012;Taboada, Brooke, Tofiloski, Voll, & Stede, 2011), and they can be easily enhanced with the inclusion of multiple dictionaries (Taboada, Brooke, & Stede, 2009).…”
Section: Approaches To Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall semantic orientation of a text is then determined by aggregating (e.g., summing) the word scores, possibly while taking into account other aspects of content as well, e.g., negation [3,5], intensification [13], or rhetorical roles of text segments [2,4]. Lexiconbased approaches enable deep, yet computationally intensive linguistic analysis to be incorporated into the process of analyzing sentiment in natural language text [2] and have been shown to have a robust performance across domains and texts [14].…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of sentiment lexicons -lists of words and their associated sentiment, possibly differentiated by Part-of-Speech (POS) and/or meaning [1] -has gained attention in recent research endeavors [2,3]. Such lexicon-based methods have been shown to have a more robust performance across domains and texts than pure machine learning approaches [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%