2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-65002005000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing requirements of knowledge management systems with the support of agent organizations

Abstract: Knowledge Management (KM) is considered by many organizations a key aspect in sustaining competi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These quality attributes are referred to using a variety of terms including: non-functional requirements, constraints, quality attributes, quality goals, or quality of service requirements (Gross, 2005;Kirikova et al, 2002;Reekie & McAdam, 2006;Sommerville, 2007;van Lamsweerde & Letier, 2003). However, goal models are often perceived as useful only at the early stages of requirements analysis to arrive at a shared understanding between stakeholders (Guizzardi & Perini, 2005;Jureta & Faulkner, 2007). Following this they are usually discarded and the quality goals deprioritised.…”
Section: Emotional Goals In Agent-oriented Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These quality attributes are referred to using a variety of terms including: non-functional requirements, constraints, quality attributes, quality goals, or quality of service requirements (Gross, 2005;Kirikova et al, 2002;Reekie & McAdam, 2006;Sommerville, 2007;van Lamsweerde & Letier, 2003). However, goal models are often perceived as useful only at the early stages of requirements analysis to arrive at a shared understanding between stakeholders (Guizzardi & Perini, 2005;Jureta & Faulkner, 2007). Following this they are usually discarded and the quality goals deprioritised.…”
Section: Emotional Goals In Agent-oriented Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%