Analyzing powers for elastic and inelastic scattering of polarized<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Li</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts /><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow /></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>from<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal"

Reber, E. L.; Kemper, K. W.; Green, P. V.; Kerr, P. L.; Mendez, A. J.; Myers, E. G.; Schmidt, B.; Hnizdo, V.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.50.2917

Cited by 15 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analyses by Reber et al [26,27] of polarized Li scattering by ' C at 30 MeV found that reorientation of the ground state of Li was a major contribution to the elastic scattering TAP T2&. A similar conclusion has also been reported by Kerr et al [28].…”

Section: Second-rank Tap'ssupporting

confidence: 63%

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58
Rusek
¹
,
Clarke
²
,
Tungate
³

et al. 1995
Phys. Rev. C
10
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently published data for the elastic scattering of 70.5 MeV polarized Li by Ni have been compared with the results of coupled-channels calculations. The diagonal and off-diagonal potentials used in the analysis were generated from phenomenological u + Ni and d + Ni optical potentials via the cluster-folding method. Examined were the effects of projectile excitation to the three low-lying T=0 resonant states and to nonresonant continuum states in the energy range 0.63 MeV -10.03 MeV, relative to the Li~o. +d breakup threshold at 1.47 MeV. In common with earlier analyses, calculations limited to the resonant excited states reproduced the data only when the interaction and coupling potentials were renormalized. However, the inclusion of the nonresonant excited states removed the need for this renormalization. Calculations including both the resonant and nonresonant states yielded a description of the differential cross section data superior to that resulting from calculations limited to the resonant states even when the latter were performed with renormalized potentials. Calculations of the tensor analyzing powers reproduced the data well and favored a near zero value for the spectroscopic amplitude of the D-state admixture in the Li ground state cluster wave function.PACS number(s): 25. 10.s, 24. 10.Eq, 24.70.+s

show abstract

Section: Second-rank Tap'ssupporting

confidence: 63%

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58
Rusek
¹
,
Clarke
²
,
Tungate
³

et al. 1995
Phys. Rev. C
10
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The strengths of the coupling potentials are determined so as to reproduce the known electric transition rates such as the B(Eλ) values, if available. Otherwise, they are treated as the free parameters that are chosen so that the CC calculation reproduces the experimental data of the elastic and inelastic scattering [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Channel coupling effect and important role of imaginary part of coupling potential for high-energy heavy-ion scatterings

Furumoto

Sakuragi

2013

Phys. Rev. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recent works by the present authors and their collaborator predicted that the real part of heavy-ion optical potentials changes its character from attraction to repulsion around the incident energy per nucleon E/A = 200 -300 MeV on the basis of the complex G-matrix interaction and the double-folding model (DFM) and revealed that the three-body force plays an important role there. In the present paper, we have analyzed the energy dependence of the coupling effect with the microscopic coupled channel (MCC) method and its relation to the elastic and inelastic-scattering angular distributions in detail in the case of the 12 C + 12 C system in the energy range of E/A = 100 -400 MeV. The large channel coupling effect is clearly seen in the elastic cross section although the incident energies are enough high. The dynamical polarization potential (DPP) is derived to investigate the channel coupling effect. Moreover, we analyze the effect of the imaginary part of the coupling potential on elastic and inelastic cross sections.

show abstract

“…(10) depends only on L = 0 and L= 2 terms, whereas that in Eq. (9) involves L= 0, 1, and 2 unless the approximation D2 = 2 Do is used.The data and calculations at both 30 and 50 MeV have been transformed to the barred coordinate system and the combinations in Eqs (9). and(10)formed.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Tensor effects in6Li→+12C scattering

et al. 1995

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A complete set of analyzing powers (iT», Tzo, Tz, , and Tzz) are reported for the elastic scattering of 50 MeV Li by ' C. They are as large as or larger than those measured earlier for 30 MeV Li. A combined optical model analysis of both energies shows Tz& to arise from the tensor interaction, Tzo to involve a combination of tensor and J-dependent interactions, and iT» to be the most complicated, arising from an explicit spin-orbit, as well as tensor and J-dependent interactions. A coordinate transformation of the data and calculations, suggested in the earlier work of Hooton and Johnson, provides the clearest evidence for the need of a tensor interaction to describe Li scattering. Examining the optical model calculations in terms of transferred angular momentum amplitudes provides further insight into the role played by each interaction. Also presented are the analyzing powers for the "He( Li, He) polarimeter reaction at this higher bombarding energy.PACS number(s): 24.70.+s, 24. 10.Ht, 25.70.Bc, 21.30.+y

show abstract

Analyzing powers for elastic and inelastic scattering of polarizedLi6from

Cited by 15 publications

References 32 publications

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58
Rusek
¹
,
Clarke
²
,
Tungate
³

et al. 1995
Phys. Rev. C
10
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58
Rusek
¹
,
Clarke
²
,
Tungate
³

et al. 1995
Phys. Rev. C
10
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Channel coupling effect and important role of imaginary part of coupling potential for high-energy heavy-ion scatterings

Tensor effects in6Li→+12C scattering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Analyzing powers for elastic and inelastic scattering of polarizedLi6from

Cited by 15 publications

References 32 publications

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58Rusek1, Clarke2, Tungate3 et al. 1995Phys. Rev. C10010View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58Rusek1, Clarke2, Tungate3 et al. 1995Phys. Rev. C10010View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Channel coupling effect and important role of imaginary part of coupling potential for high-energy heavy-ion scatterings

Tensor effects in6Li→+12C scattering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58
Rusek
¹
,
Clarke
²
,
Tungate
³

et al. 1995
Phys. Rev. C
10
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nonresonant breakup effects in→6+58
Rusek
¹
,
Clarke
²
,
Tungate
³

et al. 1995
Phys. Rev. C
10
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite