2002
DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2002.11506528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Income Convergence at the County Level: The Case of Development in Central Appalachia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth associated with these sectors outpaced the predicted growth of the mining sector as a whole, as sectors such as oil and gas extraction contributed to faster-than-expected income growth. This result is consistent with the findings of Santopietro (2002), who found that boom cycles associated with extractive industries can lead to unpredictable results in a convergence model. Over time, these outlier effects can lessen as rural, extractive economies diversify and become more strongly integrated in the national economy, as James and James (2015) noted in the case of central Appalachia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Growth associated with these sectors outpaced the predicted growth of the mining sector as a whole, as sectors such as oil and gas extraction contributed to faster-than-expected income growth. This result is consistent with the findings of Santopietro (2002), who found that boom cycles associated with extractive industries can lead to unpredictable results in a convergence model. Over time, these outlier effects can lessen as rural, extractive economies diversify and become more strongly integrated in the national economy, as James and James (2015) noted in the case of central Appalachia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Whether conditional or unconditional, these models have been applied widely in the United States at the national, state, and local levels (Berry and Kaserman 1993;Austin and Schmidt 1998;Rey and Montouri 1999;P. Johnson and Takeyama 2001;Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater 2002;Santopietro, 2002;Higgins, Levy, and Young 2006;Rapino, Spaulding, and Hanink 2006). Though evidence of convergence is generally present, model performance and predictor significance are sometimes inconsistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They found a sectoral‐geographical effect, with the relative success of coal mining in that state's southern tier driving income swings that sometimes indicated convergence and at other times indicated divergence. Santopietro (2002) analyzed income convergence across all the counties of Appalachia with similar results; the resource‐based (coal) counties have a boom‐bust cycle that seems to limit income convergence from occurring as any type of ongoing process. Another analysis concerned county level per capita income convergence across the Great Plains (Austin and Schmidt 1998).…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…(, ) study the effects of coal market boom and bust on employment and other indicators of health in local Appalachian labor markets. In a cross‐sectional study, Santopietro () finds that income levels in the Appalachian region are only very slowly converging, and attributes some of this slow rate of convergence to the region's reliance on natural resource industries. Kilkenny and Partridge () find that export sector employment, represented in part by the share of employment in mining, fails to significantly contribute to rural economic growth.…”
Section: The Appalachian Region As a Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%