2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58957-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing eID Public Acceptance and User Preferences for Current Authentication Options in Estonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H5 was accepted. This research found a link between transparency and NDIV platform adoption among young investors, and H5 was approved, confirming the theory and as per past studies (Hartanto and Siregar, 2021;Oldeweme et al, 2021;Tsap et al, 2020;Venkatesh et al, 2016). When combined with PMT variables, this study added to the current data offered by URT by providing new insight into the relationship between transparency and acceptance.…”
Section: Table 2 Confirmatory Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H5 was accepted. This research found a link between transparency and NDIV platform adoption among young investors, and H5 was approved, confirming the theory and as per past studies (Hartanto and Siregar, 2021;Oldeweme et al, 2021;Tsap et al, 2020;Venkatesh et al, 2016). When combined with PMT variables, this study added to the current data offered by URT by providing new insight into the relationship between transparency and acceptance.…”
Section: Table 2 Confirmatory Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Transparency was demonstrated to have a beneficial and significant impact on the intention to utilise cryptocurrency (Miraz et al, 2022) and local government services (Hartanto and Siregar, 2021). Furthermore, it was discovered to be a significant predictor of digital identity acceptance (Tsap et al, 2020). The intention to use contact tracing programs was positively influenced by three characteristics of transparency: disclosure, clarity, and accuracy (Oldeweme et al, 2021).…”
Section: Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of e-signature services worldwide [65] still use "flinstone" techniques for signing documents such as drawing a signature on the screen, or uploading a picture with signature. There are many barriers to implement contemporary eID and digital signature solutions in many countries in the world including EU in a secure, user-friendly, and scalable manner and -as a consequence -to have them adopted by the citizens [66, 33,67,31,68,69]. As indicated by several studies [70][71][72], eIDs and digital signatures are used mostly by major enterprises, whereas their usage by SMEs (small/medium enterprises) and ordinary citizens is marginal -due to the lack of a broad range of e-government services and a low usability of the systems.…”
Section: An Electronic Identity and Digital Signature Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are major differences between countries, inside and outside of the European Union, when it comes to the success of digital identity infrastructure. On the one hand there are countries like Estonia where eID is considered as part of the critical infrastructure and more than 2/3 of citizens regularly use eID services that the state offers (Tsap et al, 2020). On the other hand, there are countries like Germany, where only 7% of the German citizens' have ever used the eID function of their electronic ID card (PwC, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%