2010 5th International Symposium on Telecommunications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/istel.2010.5734075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing delay limits of high-speed wireless ad hoc networks based on IEEE 802.11n

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) When the size of aggregated frame is raised, the delay is considerably increased because of the time added when waiting for other packets in the queue to construct the A-MPDU frame. This was proved by authors in [19,35,37,38]. Particularly, for low rate applications such as VoIP, the required delay to fill the aggregated frame will be increased.…”
Section: [33]mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(ii) When the size of aggregated frame is raised, the delay is considerably increased because of the time added when waiting for other packets in the queue to construct the A-MPDU frame. This was proved by authors in [19,35,37,38]. Particularly, for low rate applications such as VoIP, the required delay to fill the aggregated frame will be increased.…”
Section: [33]mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Authors in handle the weakness of 802.11 aggregation schemes by providing a detailed analysis of packet delay. They considered the packet delay as the amount of time separating the instant of generating this packet and the instant of successfully receiving it.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, there are some others works that focused on proposing QoS mechanisms such as admission control to provide QoS satisfaction for real-time applications when using the aggregation mechanism. Authors in [15] handle with the weakness of 802.11 aggregation schemes by providing a detailed analysis of packet delay. They considered the packet delay as the amount of time separating the instant of generating this packet and the instant of successfully receiving it.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He shows that with retransmission policy, the video quality is improved without increasing the end‐to‐end delay. Authors in handle with the weakness of 802.11 aggregation schemes in term of delay, they presented a detailed analysis on packet delay that refers the amount of time separating the instant of generating this packet and the instant of successfully receiving it. They conducted that minimum packet delay can be granted with only a single aggregation size depending on the PHY rate while transmitting large aggregation frame size increases delay.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%