Analyzing competitiveness of clothing export sector of India and Bangladesh

Abstract

Purpose -The textiles and clothing sector is one of India's most important economic sectors, next to the agriculture sector in terms of industrial output and employment, providing employment to more than 30 million people. Many studies predict that India will get a significant share of the world textiles and clothing trade due to the advantage of cheap labor and other factor resources but India's slower growth rate, as compared to other low-cost competitors, indicates otherwise. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the comparative advantage of India and Bangladesh for the clothing sector in the world export trade with the help of Balassa's index of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA). The study highlights the shift in comparative advantage for India and Bangladesh between two periods. The study also points out constraints restricting the growth of export share of India in world market and offers suggestions to policy makers for enhancing India's export share in the world clothing trade. Design/methodology/approach -RCA indices have been calculated for various clothing product categories (under Harmonized System) up to four digit classification with the help of Balassa's relative measure for India and Bangladesh. Tables have been prepared for India and Bangladesh, highlighting products having comparatively higher revealed comparative advantage. For calculation of RCA indices, the export data have been taken from "UN Comtrade", an electronic database of the United Nations and from the database of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Further, Spearman rank correlation coefficient has been calculated for analyzing the changes over the period 1995-2003 for India and Bangladesh. Findings -Findings reveal that the number of products for which India enjoyed the comparative advantage increased from 23 products to 25 products between 1995 and 2003 and for Bangladesh, this number increased from 21 products to 29 products between 1995 and 2003. Clothing exports of India and Bangladesh are classified on the basis of comparative advantage at the HS 4-digit level for the years 1995 and 2003 and the comparative position is given on the basis of a measure of structural change in exports of India and Bangladesh. The products in which India and Bangladesh have comparative advantage in garment exports are highlighted. Originality/value -This paper has calculated and compared revealed comparative advantage indices over a period of time up to four digits classification of HS product categories. Also, this paper highlights constraints, and offer suggestions which would be helpful to exporters and policy makers.

Competitiveness of Indonesian Tea in International Market

“…the export ratio of every economy sector towards the total exports in a country, which is relative to the ratio of world exports for each sector related to total world exports. RCA was chosen because it can mitigate the impact of the effects of the government intervention, so that the comparative advantage of a commodity over time can be seen clearly (Ahtar et al 2009;Shoufen et al 2011;Natalia and Nurozy, 2012;Yanti and Widyastutik, 2012;Kathuria, 2013;Kuldilok et al 2013;Ozcelik and Erlat, 2013;Rifin, 2013). According to Batra and Khan (2005) RCA index is formulated as follows:…”

A tale of soil and seeds: the external environment and entrepreneurial entry

“…The successful catch-up experience of many countries in Asia is based on entrepreneurial entry into low technology global value chains in sectors like apparel and footwear (Tewari 2006;Kathuria 2013). The labor pools in these developing countries are such that they have a comparative advantage in these low technology sectors.…”

Strategic fit: model development and fitness analysis of a manufacturing unit

“…For this reason, the management gave the maximum weight value (5) (5) for good order variation. When management fails to solve order variation or show poor performance to solve order variation this causes the failure of order shipment and due time production (Roth & Miller, 1992;Masud, 2010;Mohan Kathuria, 2013;Nuruzzaman, 2013;Rahman & Al Amin, 2016;Mondal et al, 2017). Hence, they gave low weight value (1) for moderate order variation capabilities and no weight (0) for low order variation capabilities.…”