2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Clothing Layer Deformation Statistics of 3D Human Motions

Abstract: Recent capture technologies and methods allow not only to retrieve 3D model sequence of moving people in clothing, but also to separate and extract the underlying body geometry, motion component and the clothing as a geometric layer. So far this clothing layer has only been used as raw offsets for individual applications such as retargeting a different body capture sequence with the clothing layer of another sequence, with limited scope, e.g. using identical or similar motions. The structured, semantics and mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shape and clothing have been recovered from RGB images [31,15], depth [16], or scan data [56], but require manual intervention or clothing is limited to a pre-defined set of templates. In [78] a fuzzy vertex association from clothing to body surface is introduced, which allows complex clothing modeled as body offsets. Some works are in-between free-form and model-based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape and clothing have been recovered from RGB images [31,15], depth [16], or scan data [56], but require manual intervention or clothing is limited to a pre-defined set of templates. In [78] a fuzzy vertex association from clothing to body surface is introduced, which allows complex clothing modeled as body offsets. Some works are in-between free-form and model-based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Neophytou and Hilton [35] learn a layered garment model on top of SCAPE [6] from dynamic sequences, but generalization to novel poses is not demonstrated. Yang et al [52] train a neural network to regress a PCA-based representation of clothing, but show generalization on the same sequence or on the same subject. Lähner et al [28] learn a garment-specific pose-deformation model by regressing low-frequency PCA components and high frequency normal maps.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping from a given body shape and pose to clothing shape is one-to-many. However, existing regression-based clothing models [16,52] produce deterministic results that fail to capture the stochastic nature of clothing deformations. In contrast, we formulate clothing modeling as a probabilistic generation task: for a single pose and body shape, multiple clothing deformations can be sampled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a dynamic scan sequence, Neophytou et al [42] learn a two layer model (body and clothing) and use it to dress novel shapes. A similar model has been recently proposed [61], where the clothing layer is associated to the body in a fuzzy fashion. Other methods [60,64] focus explicitly on estimating the body shape under clothing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, we register a single template set to multiple scan instancesvarying in garment geometry, subject identity and pose, which requires a new solution. Most importantly, unlike all previous work [35,47,61], we learn per-garment models and train a CNN to predict body shape and garment geometry directly from images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%