2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31625-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical ultracentrifugation in saliva research: Impact of green tea astringency and its significance on the in-vivo aroma release

Abstract: Current saliva testing methods rely on cutting edge yet expensive techniques for the detection and analysis of genetic material, proteins and biomarkers for clinical use. However, these techniques are limited in scope and often cannot be used with complex food materials. We propose an efficient ex-vivo tool for evaluating biologically relevant interactions between food components and human saliva using sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV-AUC). We evaluated macromolecular content from “uns… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous ex-vivo experiments using real human saliva have also confirmed a significant reduction in the headspace concentration of linear aldehydes, but not to this extent [28]. It is worth highlighting potential issues associated with the validity of this and other similar ex-vivo tissues [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous ex-vivo experiments using real human saliva have also confirmed a significant reduction in the headspace concentration of linear aldehydes, but not to this extent [28]. It is worth highlighting potential issues associated with the validity of this and other similar ex-vivo tissues [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…During consumption of food, saliva is the first medium encountered by aroma compounds as they travel to the respiratory tract and to the olfactory receptors in the nose [3]. Saliva consists of a number of macromolecular components which protect and lubricate the lining of the oral cavity: mucins, amylases, proteins and antibodies, which play a role in regulating pH and normal functioning of the salivary film [[4, 5]. Mucin glycoproteins are the second most abundant salivary components, after salivary α-amylase, and define the structure and functionality of saliva [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These salivary changes trigger salivary glands to produce more saliva in order to compensate for the loss in functionality and to keep the oral cavity lubricated [8]. But the process is faster at replacing low molecular weight enzymes and peptides, and rather slow at replenishing viscous, higher molecular weight mucins, therefore stimulated saliva has lower mucin levels than resting saliva [5]. This effect is predicted to influence the partitioning of aroma compounds from the saliva to the olfactory receptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many mechanisms of astringency have been proposed, including the loss of lubrication, the inactivation of neuroepithelial taste receptor cells (TRCs), and the interaction of polyphenols with salivary proteins [ 8 ]. Among them, the most established mechanism involves the interaction of astringency-causing polyphenols and certain salivary proteins, such as proline-rich proteins and α-amylase [ 9 ]. This interaction induces the aggregation and precipitation of the salivary proteins, eliciting the sensation of dryness and the astringency feeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%