2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical theories for near coplanar and polar circumbinary orbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allowed for the inclusion of the various non-Keplerian orbital effect found in circumbinary systems (e.g. Leung 2013; Li et al 2013). The planets were put in orbits coplanar with the binaries on periods of 10.2 P bin and 300 d. These were made slightly eccentric (e=0.05, with a uniform distribution of argument of periapsis between 0 and 2π) so that the additional TTVs which eccentricity may bring were not excluded.…”
Section: Transit Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed for the inclusion of the various non-Keplerian orbital effect found in circumbinary systems (e.g. Leung 2013; Li et al 2013). The planets were put in orbits coplanar with the binaries on periods of 10.2 P bin and 300 d. These were made slightly eccentric (e=0.05, with a uniform distribution of argument of periapsis between 0 and 2π) so that the additional TTVs which eccentricity may bring were not excluded.…”
Section: Transit Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. However, maybe because of the fast precession of induced by the binary (see Farago & Laskar 2010;Li et al 2014), closer resonances are unstable (3/1 and 4/1). In contrast to the planetary case, we identify that regions inside of the stronger N/1 MMRs are chaotic (mainly observed in MMR 3/1 and 4/1).…”
Section: Coplanar Circumbinary Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of CB inclined planets at these distances leads to circulation of because of the interaction with the binary. Moreover, outside the nodal resonances, the node Ω circulates (Farago & Laskar 2010;Doolin & Blundell 2011;Li et al 2014). Our model calculates the width of the resonance for a fixed value of and Ω, and we analyzed the dependence of widths for different values from 0 • to 180 • .…”
Section: Inclined Circumbinary Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. However, maybe because the fast precession of induced by the binary (see Farago & Laskar 2010;Li et al 2014), closer resonances are unstable (3/1 and 4/1). Contrary to planetary case, we identify that regions inside of the stronger N/1 MMRs are chaotic (mainly observed in MMR 3/1, 4/1).…”
Section: Coplanar Circumbinary Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of CB inclined planets at these distances leads to circulation of because the interaction with the binary. Also, outside the nodal resonances, the node Ω circulates (Farago & Laskar 2010;Doolin & Blundell 2011;Li et al 2014). Our model calculates the width of the resonance for a fixed value of and Ω and we analyze the dependency of widths for different values from 0 • to 180 • .…”
Section: Inclined Circumbinary Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%