2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.104022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solutions for two inhomogeneous cosmological models with energy flow and dynamical curvature

Abstract: Recently we have introduced a nonrelativistic cosmological model (NRCM) exhibiting a dynamical spatial curvature. For this model the present day cosmic acceleration is not attributed to a negative pressure (dark energy) but it is driven by a nontrivial energy flow leading to a negative spatial curvature. In this paper we generalize the NRCM in two different ways to the relativistic regime and present analytical solutions of the corresponding Einstein equations. These relativistic models are characterized by tw… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where q i is the number of parameters and L i is the maximum likelihood of model i, where p i is the probability that model i minimizes the (estimated) information loss, and where the two models are labelled i = 1, 2, respectively. The AIC relative likelihood measure (25) can be viewed as a generalization of the likelihood ratio to non-nested models. The interpretation of the relative numerical estimates of the AIC measure for different models is context-dependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where q i is the number of parameters and L i is the maximum likelihood of model i, where p i is the probability that model i minimizes the (estimated) information loss, and where the two models are labelled i = 1, 2, respectively. The AIC relative likelihood measure (25) can be viewed as a generalization of the likelihood ratio to non-nested models. The interpretation of the relative numerical estimates of the AIC measure for different models is context-dependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 for further motivations for introducing the template metric, where it is discussed how constant-curvature metrics can be obtained via Ricci flow smoothing of Riemannian hypersurfaces. 24 Even though the template metric described in this section is not solution to Einstein's equations, local metrics of the same form have been studied as solutions to the Einstein equations (see the recent paper by Stichel 25 and references therein).…”
Section: Distance Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate modelling of non-linear 3-Ricci (spatial) curvature is a key challenge that all of these software packages need to meet if they are to be used to test the hypothesis that structure formation leads to recently emerging negative mean curvature that physically explains 'dark energy' (Räsänen 2006;Nambu & Tanimoto 2005;Kai et al 2007;Räsänen 2008;Larena et al 2009;Chiesa et al 2014;Wiegand & Buchert 2010;Buchert & Räsänen 2012;Wiltshire 2009;Duley et al 2013;Nazer & Wiltshire 2015;Roukema et al 2013;Barbosa et al 2016;Bolejko & Célérier 2010;Lavinto et al 2013;Roukema 2018;Sussman et al 2015;Chirinos Isidro et al 2017;Bolejko 2017b,a;Krasinski 1981Krasinski , 1982Krasinski , 1983Stichel 2016Stichel , 2018Coley 2010;Kašpar & Svítek 2014;Rácz et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate modelling of non-linear 3-Ricci (spatial) curvature is a key challenge that all of these software packages need to meet if they are to be used to test the hypothesis that structure formation leads to recently emerging negative mean curvature that physically explains 'dark energy' (Räsänen 2006;Nambu & Tanimoto 2005;Kai et al 2007;Räsänen 2008;Larena et al 2009;Chiesa et al 2014;Wiegand & Buchert 2010;Buchert & Räsänen 2012;Wiltshire 2009;Duley et al 2013;Nazer & Wiltshire 2015;Roukema et al 2013;Barbosa et al 2016;Bolejko & Célérier 2010;Lavinto et al 2013;Roukema 2018;Sussman et al 2015;Chirinos Isidro et al 2017;Bolejko 2017b,a;Krasinski 1981Krasinski , 1982Krasinski , 1983Stichel 2016Stichel , 2018Coley 2010;Kašpar & Svítek 2014;Rácz et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%