1994
DOI: 10.1016/0009-9120(94)00054-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical quality control in neonatal screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentials in the uptake of disorders into screening programmes are suggestive of discrepancies between screening criteria and a lack of international standardization (Tuuminen et al 1994). The development of screening programmes and the differences that have evolved are the consequence of context-specific interpretations of and amendments to screening criteria (Clague and Thomas 2002; Padilla et al 2010).…”
Section: Newborn Metabolic Screening Programme: a Short Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differentials in the uptake of disorders into screening programmes are suggestive of discrepancies between screening criteria and a lack of international standardization (Tuuminen et al 1994). The development of screening programmes and the differences that have evolved are the consequence of context-specific interpretations of and amendments to screening criteria (Clague and Thomas 2002; Padilla et al 2010).…”
Section: Newborn Metabolic Screening Programme: a Short Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, these decisions are made by and directly impact upon the baby’s parents, an additional complication that needs special consideration. Despite this, there has been no international consensus on an appropriate set of criteria for the newborn context (Clague and Thomas 2002; Padilla et al 2010; Tuuminen et al 1994). In order to explore how these difficulties are managed in practice, we now turn to a specific case study: New Zealand.…”
Section: Screening Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional standardization has been more successful (Watanabe et al 2006). The need for international guidelines for newborn screening methods assessment and comparison, with an emphasis on clinical relevance, has been argued (Tuuminen et al 1994).…”
Section: Laboratory Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%