2006
DOI: 10.1039/b516188f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical performance characteristics of nanoelectrospray emitters as a function of conductive coating

Abstract: As miniaturization of electrospray continues to become more prevalent in the mass spectrometry arsenal, numerous types of conductive coatings have been developed with miniaturized electrospray emitters. Different conductive coatings have different properties that may lead to differences in analytical performance. This paper investigates and compares the analytical properties of a series of applied conductive coatings for low-flow electrospray ionization developed in this laboratory vs. commercially-available t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies using borosilicate emitters, 300 µg/mL of NPY solution (MeOH/water/HCOOH, 50:50:0.1) was analyzed by nanoESI‐MS (spray voltage = 3.0 kV). To determine the amount of NPY consumed during the analysis, the average flow rate of the borosilicate emitter had to be measured, as discussed previously 35. The tests were done in triplicate to obtain the average flow rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies using borosilicate emitters, 300 µg/mL of NPY solution (MeOH/water/HCOOH, 50:50:0.1) was analyzed by nanoESI‐MS (spray voltage = 3.0 kV). To determine the amount of NPY consumed during the analysis, the average flow rate of the borosilicate emitter had to be measured, as discussed previously 35. The tests were done in triplicate to obtain the average flow rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, however, was shown to be passivated, although it still gave stable spray. Another comparative study was done by Smith et al (2006) for the analytical performance of tips coated with Au/Pt and their own graphite-coated and polyaniline-coated emitters. In their investigation they concluded that the choice of emitter depends on the application.…”
Section: Mode Of Electrical Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6A). Nevertheless, substantial progress has been made over the last years and less damageable tip‐coatings based on different metals, conductive organic compounds or graphite have been developed and compared with respect to their performance 112, 113. An interesting approach, showing that low‐flow interfaces can also be realized using a sheath flow design, has been presented by the group of Her 114.…”
Section: Technical Innovations In Ce‐msmentioning
confidence: 99%