2013
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical performance and method comparison study of the total homocysteine immunoassay on the AIA 600II analyser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bias comprised between 19% and 38%) [11]. Overall, our analytical evaluation produced comparable results to those previously published by Novembrino et al, who used a different total homocysteine immunoassay on AIA 600II analyzer, and found a LoD of 0.15 μmol/L, optimal linearity up to 40 μmol/L, imprecision values comprised between 3.8% and 8.2%, and bias between 0.5 and 0.8 μmol/L [12].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…bias comprised between 19% and 38%) [11]. Overall, our analytical evaluation produced comparable results to those previously published by Novembrino et al, who used a different total homocysteine immunoassay on AIA 600II analyzer, and found a LoD of 0.15 μmol/L, optimal linearity up to 40 μmol/L, imprecision values comprised between 3.8% and 8.2%, and bias between 0.5 and 0.8 μmol/L [12].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%