2005
DOI: 10.1364/ao.44.001323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical function for lidar geometrical compression form-factor calculations

Abstract: A simple model of image formation in a Newtonian telescope was used for calculating an analytical formula, that describes the geometric compression form factors of coaxial and biaxial lidars. Calculations were successfully validated by comparison with real measurements, confirming the accuracy of our approach. The need for different alignment of coaxial and biaxial systems to increase the overlap between the lidar emitter and receiver is also discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a), with the constraint that A tilt ≤ RFOV − LBD, allows a decrease of the RFOV with constant DFO or a decrease of the DFO with constant RFOV (Stelmaszczyk et al, 2005). The optimum A tilt is either the one that minimizes the RFOV or the DFO respectively, and for both aforementioned cases becomes equal to…”
Section: Description Through Paraxial Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1a), with the constraint that A tilt ≤ RFOV − LBD, allows a decrease of the RFOV with constant DFO or a decrease of the DFO with constant RFOV (Stelmaszczyk et al, 2005). The optimum A tilt is either the one that minimizes the RFOV or the DFO respectively, and for both aforementioned cases becomes equal to…”
Section: Description Through Paraxial Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies in the literature related to the determination of the overlap function of lidar systems analytically (e.g., Halldórsson and Langerholc, 1978;Jenness et al, 1997;Chourdakis et al, 2002;Stelmaszczyk et al, 2005;Comeron et al, 2011) or experimentally (e.g., Sasano et al, 1979;Tomine et al, 1989;Dho et al, 1997;GuerreroRascado et al, 2010;Wandinger and Ansmann, 2002). For the theoretical approaches, a good understanding of the actual light distribution in the laser beam cross section, and the characteristics of the receiving unit are needed to obtain an overlap profile with sufficient accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overlap function can theoretically be modelled if the specifications and configuration of the optical elements of the lidar are known (Kuze et al, 1998;Stelmaszczyk et al, 2005). In practice, due to several unknown instrumental efPublished by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometrical optics has been employed analytically [12][13][14][15][16], through ray tracing [17,18], and in a hybrid approach along with diffraction theory [19]. These theoretical techniques are extremely useful for lidar system design; however, the success of these approaches for overlap calibration of a specific instrument in the field relies on reliable knowledge of system parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%