2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical evaluation of HgbA1c, microalbumin, CRP, and RF on Architect ci8200 integrated system and workflow performance evaluation using computer simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Although this test obtains rapid results, the accuracy compared with values obtained by the standard assessment of HbA1c is questionable. 39 In contrast, our finger-stick and Whatman paper collection method and the standard immunoturbidimetric assessment of HbA1c on an Abbott ci8200 clinical chemistry analyzer 26 showed a very high correlation with the venipuncture collection method and subsequent HbA1c measurement (r=0.99). Despite a less accurate HbA1c determination, the results of the recent study 38 corroborate our findings that a substantial number of patients with suspected new diabetes in the periodontitis group can be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 Although this test obtains rapid results, the accuracy compared with values obtained by the standard assessment of HbA1c is questionable. 39 In contrast, our finger-stick and Whatman paper collection method and the standard immunoturbidimetric assessment of HbA1c on an Abbott ci8200 clinical chemistry analyzer 26 showed a very high correlation with the venipuncture collection method and subsequent HbA1c measurement (r=0.99). Despite a less accurate HbA1c determination, the results of the recent study 38 corroborate our findings that a substantial number of patients with suspected new diabetes in the periodontitis group can be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Two 6 mm punches were incubated in 400 μL hemolysis buffer of the standard HbA1c test, which was measured immunoturbidimetrically on an Abbott ci8200 clinical chemistry analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA). 26 The finger-stick and Whatman paper collection method was previously validated against the conventional EDTA blood collection by venipuncture according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP9 method comparison protocol. Precision and stability studies of HbA1c on Whatman 903 collection cards have been reported 27 and showed that the finger-stick collection card and punch method for HbA1c determination was highly correlated with the standard EDTA blood collection method (regression analysis r=0.99; see online supplementary figure S1).…”
Section: Blood Collection and Hba1c Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For setting the criteria for acceptable imprecision and inaccuracy, we considered the biological variations of analytes (7,10,11). Depending on the measurement procedure, measuring instruments and compliance with a reference or de nitive method, we can assess whether the new method or analyzer is suitable for routine use, and whether they are of satisfactory accuracy (2,3,5,12). For most analytes tested in this study, the results of imprecision and bias were in the range of desirable speci cations for imprecision and bias, derived from biological variation (10,11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%