2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2017.2668404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and Experimental Investigations on Mitigation of Interference in a DBF MIMO Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is one special issue concerning DBF in linear frequency modulated radars. As these systems typically do not have an I-Q receiver, the interference energy is spread over multiple directions of arrival because of the image frequency of the interfering signal [86].…”
Section: Spatial Masking Of Interference Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is one special issue concerning DBF in linear frequency modulated radars. As these systems typically do not have an I-Q receiver, the interference energy is spread over multiple directions of arrival because of the image frequency of the interfering signal [86].…”
Section: Spatial Masking Of Interference Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interference affects only the physical receive array and not the whole virtual aperture. Therefore, interference can only be canceled within the physical receive aperture[86].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them: 1) zeroing or inverse windowing the interferencecontaminated parts of the signal in the time domain as in [10] and [11]. Inverse windowing the detected interference regions was proposed in [8]; 2) using waveform-diversity and receiver-architecturediversity techniques to avoid the interference (e.g., frequency ramp modulation [12], frequency hopping [13], and [14], digital beam forming for interference suppression [15]; 3) interference reconstruction and cancelation techniques [16]; 4) sparse sampling techniques in [17] (where interference detection is done by monitoring target peakpower threshold levels against the interference-induced noise, then mitigation is done by reconstructing the interference-free signal using a sparse-signal recovery algorithm); and-most recently-in [18]. While zeroing a part of the beat-frequency signal is the simplest interference suppression method, it causes signal phase discontinuity, which results in-after performing the range-compression FFT-target-response broadening in range and high-residual sidelobes.…”
Section: An Interference Mitigation Technique For Fmcwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9b ( ). This is happening because of the image frequency problem discussed in [12]: the receiver is limited to real valued signals, so that the power of interfering signals is distributed towards multiple DoAs. For further clarification we calibrate the received data with the complex conjugate phases and again perform a DoA estimation.…”
Section: Adbf Adbf Adbfmentioning
confidence: 99%