1999
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1999.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and Clinical Performance of an Automated Immunoassay System (Immulite�) for Estradiol in Serum

Abstract: The analytical and clinical performance of a commercial automated immunoassay system (Immulite) for estradiol (E2) in serum was evaluated. The functional sensitivity for E2 was 0.07 nmol/l, and analytical imprecision (<13%, <9% and <7% at 0.22, 0.51 and 1.51 nmol/l, respectively) for concentrations above this detection limit met published analytical goals. The assay recovery was good and the assay was linear over a wide concentration range. No sample carryover was found, and interferences from common substance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results were recorded with the Immulite Analyzer. Quality control of the assays was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, as well as previously published results (Costongs et al, 1995;Rodriguez-Espinosa et al, 1998). Cross-reactivity for both antisera (against progesterone and E 2 ) were evaluated by the manufacturer and found to be <1.5%.…”
Section: Serum Progesterone and Estradiol (E 2 ) Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were recorded with the Immulite Analyzer. Quality control of the assays was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, as well as previously published results (Costongs et al, 1995;Rodriguez-Espinosa et al, 1998). Cross-reactivity for both antisera (against progesterone and E 2 ) were evaluated by the manufacturer and found to be <1.5%.…”
Section: Serum Progesterone and Estradiol (E 2 ) Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these systems provide rapid turnaround times and high throughput, there presently are only limited reports regarding the analytic performance of these assays, and most do not assess accuracy with ID-GC-MS as the reference method. [5][6][7][8] The aim of our study was to assess the imprecision and accuracy of 8 automated estradiol assays with ID-GC-MS as the reference method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%