2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis workflow of publicly available RNA-sequencing datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During our analyses we included two more recently published COVID-19 datasets, two transcriptome studies from inflammatory diseases and one dataset with cohorts of other respiratory infectious diseases to compare with specific transcriptome signatures resulting from our first analysis. After evaluating the study design, number of samples, and other relevant information (e.g., COVID-19 severity), we obtained raw count files (non-normalized) after trimming and alignment to the reference genome and followed guidelines to perform a meta-analysis report [ 38 ], which recommended that we include at least three or four studies to reach a minimum of 1000 participants [ 39 ] in order to increase the statistical power of our analysis by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio. This resulted in a cohort of 1596 individuals derived from 11 datasets with transcriptome data generated from different platforms ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During our analyses we included two more recently published COVID-19 datasets, two transcriptome studies from inflammatory diseases and one dataset with cohorts of other respiratory infectious diseases to compare with specific transcriptome signatures resulting from our first analysis. After evaluating the study design, number of samples, and other relevant information (e.g., COVID-19 severity), we obtained raw count files (non-normalized) after trimming and alignment to the reference genome and followed guidelines to perform a meta-analysis report [ 38 ], which recommended that we include at least three or four studies to reach a minimum of 1000 participants [ 39 ] in order to increase the statistical power of our analysis by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio. This resulted in a cohort of 1596 individuals derived from 11 datasets with transcriptome data generated from different platforms ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalization, batch effect correction, and differential expression were performed with R package DEseq2 v1.28.1 [13]. Age was categorized according to the WHO guidelines [14]: <30 years old, every 10 years between 30 and 70 years old, and ≥70 years old as described [15]. To stratify COVID-19 positive patients based on viral load at the time of diagnosis, we used the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) of the N1 viral gene amplification as a surrogate variable for viral load (Ct > 24 = low; Ct = 24-19 = medium; Ct < 19 = high).…”
Section: Analysis Of Publicly Available Rna-seq Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During our analysis we included two more recently published COVID-19 datasets, two transcriptome studies from inflammatory diseases and one dataset with cohorts of other respiratory infectious diseases to compare with specific transcriptome signatures resulting from our first analysis. After evaluating study design, number of samples, and other relevant information (e.g., COVID-19 severity), we obtained raw count files (non-normalized) after trimming and alignment to the reference genome and followed guidelines to perform a meta-analysis report [38], which recomended to include at least three or four studies to reach a minimum of 1000 participants [39] in order to increase the statistical power of our analysis by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio. This resulted in a cohort of 1596 individuals derived from 11 datasets with transcriptome data generated from different platforms ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%